Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance

Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., Martin, A.·2018·Higher Education Research & Development

Abstract

Psychological distress is prevalent in doctoral degree training and affects students' completion time. It is crucial to monitor the amount of distress experienced and understand the causes for it to inform the type of support most needed. This mixed method study explored challenges related to candidature, self-reported progress and measures of perceived and actual psychological distress with a convenience sample of 81 doctoral candidates in an Australian university. Using validated survey instruments, participants reported higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress than age-matched general population normative data. Additionally, those who self-reported being behind or exceeding their study schedule had significantly higher scores for depression, anxiety and stress than those who reported they were meeting schedule. Conversely, stage of candidature did not affect any of these attribute scores. The responses to open-ended questions about challenges associated with doctoral study were coded and explored with an existing typology. The most frequent challenge reported in doctoral study is related to the development of generic skills, followed by management of self, including motivation. Given that not all challenges could be included in the existing typology, we recommend expansion to the typology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1177/1028315306286313 · DOI
  2. 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000018908.36113.a5 · DOI
  3. 10.5172/mra.455.2.1.71 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/978-1-137-38122-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/03075079.2011.576338 · DOI
  6. Cohen S., 1988, The social psychology of health, 31
  7. 10.1080/07448481.2013.802237 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/13562517.2011.560381 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.042 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/13562510701792112 · DOI
  11. 10.28945/3396 · DOI
  12. 10.1353/csd.2006.0030 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1080/07294360.2012.692666 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3 · DOI
  15. Lovibond S. H., 1995, Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale
  16. 10.4995/redu.2012.6102 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/07294360500453012 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/0729436990180301 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/1360080x.2012.662743 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10734-007-9059-3 · DOI
  21. Regehr C., 2012, Journal of Affective Disorders, 15, 1
  22. Richards L., 2015, Handling qualitative data: A practical guide
  23. 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/pits.20300 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/03054980120113616 · DOI
  26. Talib N., 2012, Educational Research and Review, 7, 127
  27. 10.1097/00001888-199711000-00019 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/03075079.2013.806458 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/09515070601043203 · DOI
  30. Yasin M., 2009, The Journal of Behavioural Science, 4, 49

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A.
Affiliations
  • School of Land and Food, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
  • Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
  • School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
  • School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
468-483
ISSN
  • 0729-4360
  • 1469-8366
Cited by
178
References
5
Language
en
Funders
University of Tasmania (Teaching Development Grant)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
The paper
Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979