The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance
Abstract
Psychological distress is prevalent in doctoral degree training and affects students' completion time. It is crucial to monitor the amount of distress experienced and understand the causes for it to inform the type of support most needed. This mixed method study explored challenges related to candidature, self-reported progress and measures of perceived and actual psychological distress with a convenience sample of 81 doctoral candidates in an Australian university. Using validated survey instruments, participants reported higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress than age-matched general population normative data. Additionally, those who self-reported being behind or exceeding their study schedule had significantly higher scores for depression, anxiety and stress than those who reported they were meeting schedule. Conversely, stage of candidature did not affect any of these attribute scores. The responses to open-ended questions about challenges associated with doctoral study were coded and explored with an existing typology. The most frequent challenge reported in doctoral study is related to the development of generic skills, followed by management of self, including motivation. Given that not all challenges could be included in the existing typology, we recommend expansion to the typology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research on the prevalence of mental health issues in doctoral students (e.g., Barry et al., 2018) suggests that a good and supportive supervision, as well as the communication between student and supervisor, is vital for students’ experience and overall emotional wellbeing.”
From The supervisory relationship as a predictor of mental health outcomes in doctoral students in the United Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as Barry et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
Screening for serious mental illness in the general population
Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., Howes, M. J., Normand, S.-L. T., Manderscheid, R. W., Walters, E. E., et al. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184 · Cited by 5,692
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 · Cited by 1,182
Help-Seeking and Access to Mental Health Care in a University Student Population
Eisenberg, D., Golberstein, E., & Gollust, S. E. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31803bb4c1 · Cited by 1,131
A meta-analysis of universal mental health prevention programs for higher education students
Conley, C. S., Durlak, J. A., & Kirsch, A. C. (2015) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0543-1 · Cited by 340
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1177/1028315306286313 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000018908.36113.a5 · DOI
- 10.5172/mra.455.2.1.71 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-137-38122-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075079.2011.576338 · DOI
- Cohen S., 1988, The social psychology of health, 31
- 10.1080/07448481.2013.802237 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562517.2011.560381 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.042 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562510701792112 · DOI
- 10.28945/3396 · DOI
- 10.1353/csd.2006.0030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07294360.2012.692666 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3 · DOI
- Lovibond S. H., 1995, Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale
- 10.4995/redu.2012.6102 · DOI
- 10.1080/07294360500453012 · DOI
- 10.1080/0729436990180301 · DOI
- 10.1080/1360080x.2012.662743 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10734-007-9059-3 · DOI
- Regehr C., 2012, Journal of Affective Disorders, 15, 1
- Richards L., 2015, Handling qualitative data: A practical guide
- 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pits.20300 · DOI
- 10.1080/03054980120113616 · DOI
- Talib N., 2012, Educational Research and Review, 7, 127
- 10.1097/00001888-199711000-00019 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075079.2013.806458 · DOI
- 10.1080/09515070601043203 · DOI
- Yasin M., 2009, The Journal of Behavioural Science, 4, 49
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mavrogalou-Foti, A. P., Kambouri, M. A., & Çili, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1437819 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A.
- Affiliations
- School of Land and Food, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
- Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
- Venue
- Higher Education Research & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01-19
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 468-483
- ISSN
- 0729-4360
- 1469-8366
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- University of Tasmania (Teaching Development Grant)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
- The paper
- Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979