Cited by 36Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsStudent Stress and CopingHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Effects of the MINDSTRONG© CBT-based program on depression, anxiety and healthy lifestyle behaviors in graduate health sciences students

Mazurek Melnyk, Bernadette, Hoying, Jacqueline, Tan, Alai·2022·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate effects of the MINDSTRONG© cognitive-behavioral skills building program versus an attention control program on mental health outcomes and lifestyle behaviors of graduate health professional students. Participants: 201 entering graduate students from seven health sciences colleges at a public land grant University in the U.S. Midwest. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with three-month follow-up. Valid and reliable instruments measured depression, anxiety, stress, healthy lifestyle beliefs and healthy lifestyle behaviors. Results: Students receiving MINDSTRONG© reported less depression/anxiety and healthier lifestyle behaviors than those receiving the control program. Students with elevated levels of depression/anxiety at baseline demonstrated greater benefits from the program. Conclusions: MINDSTRONG© can be used as a preventive and early intervention for improving mental health outcomes and lifestyle behaviors in graduate students. Because the program can be delivered by trained non-mental health professionals, it has the potential to be widely scaled on campuses throughout the U.S.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2020.1782922

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A pilot trial in 51 participants with MDD showed a greater reduction in the severity of depressive symptoms in patients who received the CT-152 PDT compared with those who did not.

    “a pilot trial in 51 participants with MDD showed a greater reduction in the severity of depressive symptoms in patients who received the PDT compared with those who did not”

    From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [126]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazurek Melnyk, B., Hoying, J., & Tan, A.
Affiliations
  • College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hoying, Jacqueline
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2020-07-16
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
1001-1009
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W3042420760
Cited by
36
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, anxiety, stress, healthy lifestyle behaviors, mental health prevention, early intervention, campus mental health
MeSH terms
Healthy Lifestyle, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Students, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review