CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 119Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ADULTS MOURNING SUICIDE: SELF-REPORTED CONCERNS ABOUT BEREAVEMENT, NEEDS FOR ASSISTANCE, AND HELP-SEEKING BEHAVIOR

Provini, Jessica R. Everett, Cynthi, Celine·2000·Death Studies
DOI 10.1080/074811800200667
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study empirically characterized the experiences of 227 adult next-of-kin as they mourned suicides that had occurred in New York City during 1997. Next-of-kin reported psychosocial problems including family difficulties, comorbid stressors, psychiatric symptomatology, and unresolved bereavement. Professional intervention was the most frequently reported need and the most frequently reported type of desired help. In terms of actual receipt of assistance, participants reported having received help from families, friends, and communities as well as from professionals. Although some next-of-kin had not sought help because they felt able to cope without assistance, others encounted barriers to receiving desired help. These findings warrant increased and sustained community outreach to this population. Recommendations include public education regarding de-stigmatization of suicide and the needs of the suicidally bereaved, enhancement of internal and external coping supports, facilitation of access to both professional and community help, and better coordinated and more culturally appropriate services.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/074811800200667

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Smallman T., 1997, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania
  2. Goldman L., 1996, Breaking the silence
  3. Miller T. I., 1994, Handbook of practical program evaluation, 271
  4. Morgan J. D., 1990, The dying and the bereaved teenager
  5. Shapiro E. R., 1994, Grief as a family process

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 119

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Provini, J. R. E.
Venue
Death Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2000-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
DOI
10.1080/074811800200667
OpenAlex
W2158458320
Cited by
119
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
suicide bereavement, next of kin, grief, help-seeking, psychosocial problems, help-seeking barriers, community support, family problems, psychiatric symptoms, coping support
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Mental Health Services, New York City, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Social Support, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review