Cited by 3Death, Funerary Practices, and MourningDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attitude toward death, not religious commitment mediates the relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward life extension

Barnett, Michael D., De La Garza, Jay D.·2022·Death Studies

Abstract

Previous research has linked political ideology – right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation – with more positive attitudes toward life extension. The purpose of this study was to investigate death attitudes and religious commitment as mediators of the relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward life extension. College students (N = 406) completed an online survey. One death attitude – neutral acceptance – and not religious commitment mediated the relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward life extension. Individuals with more intolerant political ideology may see death as aberrant and thus be more likely to embrace life extension technology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481187.2021.1944402

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who score high on neutral acceptance have more negative views on life extension.

    “Individuals who score high on neutral acceptance also have more negative views on life extension (i.e., attempts to extend life and fight dying through whatever means available, a concept which overlaps with the aforementioned maladaptive attempts to extend life found in many anxiety-related disorders) [53].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Becker E., 1973, The denial of death
  2. Cicirelli V. G., 2008, Conference of the International Network on Personal Meaning: Promoting Health, Spirituality, and Peace Through Meaning
  3. Glass J. C., 1990, The High School Journal, 73, 154
  4. Wong P. T., 1994, PsycTESTS Dataset
  5. Worthington E. L., 2012, Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science
  6. Zenor J., 2018, Florida Communication Journal, 46, 91

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barnett, M. D., & De La Garza, J. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Tyler (US)
  • Department of Counseling Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
Corresponding author
Barnett, Michael D.
Venue
Death Studies
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
46
Issue
10
Pages
2376-2383
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
OpenAlex
W3173683229
Cited by
3
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
political ideology, attitudes toward death, religious commitment, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, mediating effect
MeSH terms
Attitude, Authoritarianism, Humans, Life Expectancy, Politics, Social Dominance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review