Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hierarchical Multiple Regression in Counseling Research: Common Problems and Possible Remedies

Petrocelli, John V.·2003·Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Abstract

A brief content analysis was conducted on the use of hierarchical regression in counseling research published in the Journal of Counseling Psychology and the Journal of Counseling & Development during the years 1997–2001. Common problems are cited and possible remedies are described.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481756.2003.12069076

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 383

Metadata

Authors
Petrocelli, J. V.
Venue
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
9-22
ISSN
  • 0748-1756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-6302
OpenAlex
W1562874579
Cited by
383
References
48
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hierarchical Multiple Regression in Counseling Research: Common Problems and Possible Remedies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07481756.2003.12069076
The paper
Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Hierarchical Multiple Regression in Counseling Research: Common Problems and Possible Remedies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2003.12069076

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.