Cited by 6Sports Performance and TrainingBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Postural control during the back squat at different load intensities in powerlifters and weightlifters

Open access
Giustino, Valerio, Vicari, Domenico Savio Salvatore, Patti, Antonino, Figlioli, Flavia, Thomas, Ewan, Schifaudo, Naima, Tedesco, Mattia, Drid, Patrik +4 more·2024·Annals of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The movement of the barbell has been detected as success factor for the snatch and the clean and jerk events. As the barbell's movement has been shown to be related to the athlete's body movement, we hypothesized that the latter could be a success factor also for the back squat (BS) event. Hence, this study aimed to investigate postural control during the execution of the BS at different load intensities in powerlifters and weightlifters. METHODS: Seventeen powerlifters and weightlifters were enrolled and the one-repetition maximum (1-RM) of the BS of each participant was measured. Afterwards, the assessment of postural control during the execution of the BS at different load intensities (i.e. 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%) of the 1-RM of each participant was carried out through a posturographic platform to measure the displacement of the centre of pressure (CoP). The following parameters were considered: sway path length (SPL), sway ellipse surface (SES), length/surface (LFS ratio), sway mean speed (SMS), CoP coordinates along X and Y planes. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in SPL and LFS ratio, and a significant decrease in SMS as the load intensity increased. In detail, we detected a significant difference in: (a) SPL between the BS at 60% and 80%, 60% and 90%, 60% and 100%; between the BS at 70% and 90%, 70% and 100%; between the BS at 80% and 100%; and between the BS at 90% and 100%; (b) SMS between the BS at 60% and 80%, 60% and 90%; (c) LFS ratio between the BS at 60% and 90%, 60% and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that powerlifters and weightlifters adopt different postural control strategies depending on the load intensity when performing the BS. Our findings showed that higher effort could affect postural control during the BS. Thus, postural control could be considered a success factor for the BS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07853890.2024.2383965

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a previous study, as load increased, a worsening of postural control was detected in powerlifters and weightlifters performing the back squat at different intensities, increasing the risk of injury.

    “Furthermore, in our recent study we investigated the postural control of powerlifters and weightlifters who performed the BS at different intensities (25). The results of this study are in line with the abovementioned studies since, as the load increased, a worsening of postural control was detected, increasing the risk of injury.”

    From Kinematic analysis of the back squat at different load intensities in powerlifters and weightlifters (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion reports that postural sway increased as squat load increased in powerlifters and weightlifters, supporting the postural-control finding. The Conclusions discuss squat performance, not injury risk; our copy does not establish that the observed change increased the risk of injury. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giustino, V., Vicari, D. S. S., Patti, A., Figlioli, F., Thomas, E., Schifaudo, N., Tedesco, M., Drid, P., Paoli, A., Palma, A., Messina, G., & Bianco, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • A.S.D. Palermo Sport & Performance, Palermo, Italy
  • University of Novi Sad (RS)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • San Raffaele University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Patti, Antonino
Venue
Annals of Medicine
Published
2024-07-30
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
2383965-2383965
ISSN
  • 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2060
OpenAlex
W4401118097
Cited by
6
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
postural control, back squat, load intensity, powerlifters, weightlifters, center of pressure, one-repetition maximum, posturography, squat performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Posture, Weight Lifting, Weight-Bearing, Resistance Training, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review