Using two-eyed seeing to bridge Western science and Indigenous knowledge systems and understand long-term change in the Saskatchewan River Delta, Canada
Open accessAbstract
Although researchers now recognize that Indigenous knowledge can strengthen environmental planning and assessment, little research has empirically demonstrated how to bring together Indigenous knowledge and Western science to form a more complete picture of social-ecological change. This study attempts to fill this gap by using ‘two-eyed seeing’ – an approach that brings together Indigenous and Western perspectives on an equal basis – to collect and analyze changes in the Saskatchewan River Delta since upstream dams were built in the 1960s. Results found corroboration across the knowledge systems that operation of dams has lowered summer flows and created unnaturally high winter flows. The knowledge systems, however, diverged in some areas, such as the production of northern pike, where local residents observed abundant pike but records showed the pike commercial harvest declining to near zero. Indigenous knowledge alone provided information about berries and berry seasons. This two-eyed seeing approach can enhance environmental assessment and planning by providing a more accurate and coherent narrative of long-term social-ecological change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The overall high degree of agreement between knowledge systems provides further reason to be confident about understanding ecological phenomena through more than a strictly Western science lens.
“Given the overall high degree of agreement between knowledge systems (as similarly found inJackson et al., 2014;Service et al., 2014),Abu et al. (2019) provide further reason to be confident about understanding ecological phenomena through more than a strictly traditional (i.e.Western science) lens.”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Abu et al., 2019
In both Mantyka-Pringle et al. (2017) and Abu et al. (2019), water quality was found to be in a worse state based on Indigenous knowledge indicators compared with Western scientific indicators, which graded water quality more moderately.
“For instance, in both Mantyka-Pringle et al. (2017) and Abu et al. (2019), water quality was found to be in a”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Abu et al., 2019
Cites
Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3 · Cited by 1,329 · see citing works
Bridging knowledge systems to enhance governance of environmental commons: A typology of settings
Rathwell, K. J., Armitage, D., & Berkes, F. (2015) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.584 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Mantyka-Pringle, C. S., Jardine, T. D., Bradford, L., Bharadwaj, L., Kythreotis, A. P., Fresque-Baxter, J., Kelly, E., Somers, G., Doig, L. E., Jones, P. D., et al. (2017) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.008 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Possibility of Difference: Rethinking Co-management
Stevenson, M. G. (2006) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.65.2.b2dm8thgb7wa4m53 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Onwu, G. O. M., & Mufundirwa, C. (2020) · African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/18117295.2020.1816700 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abu, R., Reed, M. G., & Jardine, T. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Abu, Razak
- Venue
- International Journal of Water Resources Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-01-21
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 757-776
- ISSN
- 0790-0627 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0648
- OpenAlex
- W2913167788
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 10.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal of Water Resources Development (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Canada Excellence Research Chair in Water Security (411145])
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Keywords
- Two-Eyed Seeing, indigenous knowledge, Western science, dams, seasonal streamflow, Esox lucius, socio-ecological change, environmental assessment, environmental planning, long-term trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review