Cited by 89Indigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFish Ecology and Management Studies

Using two-eyed seeing to bridge Western science and Indigenous knowledge systems and understand long-term change in the Saskatchewan River Delta, Canada

Open access
Abu, Razak, Reed, Maureen G., Jardine, Timothy D.·2020·International Journal of Water Resources Development

Abstract

Although researchers now recognize that Indigenous knowledge can strengthen environmental planning and assessment, little research has empirically demonstrated how to bring together Indigenous knowledge and Western science to form a more complete picture of social-ecological change. This study attempts to fill this gap by using ‘two-eyed seeing’ – an approach that brings together Indigenous and Western perspectives on an equal basis – to collect and analyze changes in the Saskatchewan River Delta since upstream dams were built in the 1960s. Results found corroboration across the knowledge systems that operation of dams has lowered summer flows and created unnaturally high winter flows. The knowledge systems, however, diverged in some areas, such as the production of northern pike, where local residents observed abundant pike but records showed the pike commercial harvest declining to near zero. Indigenous knowledge alone provided information about berries and berry seasons. This two-eyed seeing approach can enhance environmental assessment and planning by providing a more accurate and coherent narrative of long-term social-ecological change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07900627.2018.1558050

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overall high degree of agreement between knowledge systems provides further reason to be confident about understanding ecological phenomena through more than a strictly Western science lens.

    “Given the overall high degree of agreement between knowledge systems (as similarly found inJackson et al., 2014;Service et al., 2014),Abu et al. (2019) provide further reason to be confident about understanding ecological phenomena through more than a strictly traditional (i.e.Western science) lens.”
  • In both Mantyka-Pringle et al. (2017) and Abu et al. (2019), water quality was found to be in a worse state based on Indigenous knowledge indicators compared with Western scientific indicators, which graded water quality more moderately.

    “For instance, in both Mantyka-Pringle et al. (2017) and Abu et al. (2019), water quality was found to be in a”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abu, R., Reed, M. G., & Jardine, T. D.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Abu, Razak
Venue
International Journal of Water Resources Development
Published
2019-01-21
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
757-776
ISSN
  • 0790-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0648
OpenAlex
W2913167788
Cited by
89
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Water Resources Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Canada Excellence Research Chair in Water Security (411145])
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
Two-Eyed Seeing, indigenous knowledge, Western science, dams, seasonal streamflow, Esox lucius, socio-ecological change, environmental assessment, environmental planning, long-term trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review