Cited by 25Media Influence and PoliticsMedia Studies and CommunicationElectoral Systems and Political Participation

Explaining Media Choice: The Role of Issue-Specific Engagement in Predicting Interest-Based and Partisan Selectivity

Feldman, Lauren, Wojcieszak, Magdalena, Stroud, Natalie Jomini, Bimber, Bruce·2018·Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media

Abstract

This study analyzes the predictors of 2 types of media selectivity: interest-based (i.e., choice of entertainment over politics) and partisan (i.e., choice of pro-attitudinal over counter-attitudinal or balanced news). Relying on a large survey-based experiment, we find that issue-specific engagement variables, including perceived issue understanding, issue importance, and issue attitude strength, predict interest-based and partisan selectivity above and beyond the influence of general political knowledge, news interest, and strength of political leanings. These results show that the drivers of selectivity are more complex than general political attributes; rather, they are contextual and reflect people’s engagement with particular issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08838151.2017.1375502

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although people do not necessarily avoid attitude-discrepant messages, attitude-consistent messages that resonate with them and confirm their desired conclusions are more likely to be preferred.

    “Although people do not necessarily avoid attitude-discrepant messages (Ahn et al., 2014;Beam, 2014;Garrett et al., 2013), it is more likely that attitude-consistent messages that resonate with them and confirm their desired conclusions are preferred (Feldman et al., 2018;Gentzkow & Shapiro, 2011;Stroud, 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldman, L., Wojcieszak, M., Stroud, N. J., & Bimber, B.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
109-130
ISSN
  • 0883-8151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6878
OpenAlex
W2794085994
Cited by
25
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  • Research Projects Support Programme of Junta de Castilla y Leon, Spain
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
media selectivity, entertainment news, news interest, issue importance, political knowledge, political orientation, news consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review