CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 785Child Development and Digital TechnologyMedia and Digital CommunicationMedia Influence and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing”

Valkenburg, Patti M., Krcmar, Marina, Peeters, Allerd L., Marseille, Nies M.·1999·Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
DOI 10.1080/08838159909364474
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Telephone interviews from a random sample of Dutch parents (N = 123 for the pilot study, N = 519 for the main study), provided an opportunity to explore television mediation activities in which parents could engage. From principal components analysis, three reliable styles of television mediation emerged: restrictive mediation, instructive mediation, and social coviewing. In addition to a number of demographic variables, parental concerns about the negative effects of television were significant predictors of style of television mediation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08838159909364474

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ball S., 1970, The first year of Sesame Street: An evaluation.
  2. Cantor J., 1996, What parents want in a television rating system: Results from a national survey.
  3. Cronbach L. J., 1990, Essentials of psychological testing: Fifth Edition.
  4. Gallop G., 1989, San Francisco Chronicle, 84
  5. Krcmar M., 1998, The effects of family communication patterns on parents’ use of advisories and the V‐chip.
  6. Nunally J., 1978, Psychometric theory.
  7. Valkenburg P. M., 1997, Vierkante ogen: Opgroeien met TV en PC. [Square Eyes: Growing up with TV and PC]
  8. Van Lil J. E., 1995, Parental influences on children's television experience.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–785 of 785

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1999-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
52-66
ISSN
  • 0883-8151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6878
DOI
10.1080/08838159909364474
OpenAlex
W2073540968
Cited by
767
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 23
FWCI
30.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
restrictive mediation, scale development, children's television viewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review