The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing”
Abstract
Telephone interviews from a random sample of Dutch parents (N = 123 for the pilot study, N = 519 for the main study), provided an opportunity to explore television mediation activities in which parents could engage. From principal components analysis, three reliable styles of television mediation emerged: restrictive mediation, instructive mediation, and social coviewing. In addition to a number of demographic variables, parental concerns about the negative effects of television were significant predictors of style of television mediation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to parental mediation theory, parents mitigate these risks through restrictive mediation (e.g., setting limits), active mediation (e.g., discussing content), and co-use (e.g., shared use of technology) [74].”
From SET-PAiREd: Designing for Parental Involvement in Learning with an AI-Assisted Educational Robot (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach.
Funk, S. G., Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290248 · Cited by 4,007
Children's Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension
Bryant, J., & Anderson, D. R. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 368
Exploring the effects of active parental mediation of television content
Austin, E. W. (1993) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838159309364212 · Cited by 271
Wright, C. R. B., & Bower, R. T. (1974) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2576058 · Cited by 174
Friedrich, L. K., & Stein, A. H. (1975) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1128830 · Cited by 173
Bybee, C. R., Robinson, D., & Turow, J. (1982) · Journal of Broadcasting · doi:10.1080/08838158209364038 · Cited by 165
Mediation: The Role of Significant Others
Corder-Bolz, C. R. (1980) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01997.x · Cited by 128
Effects of Encouraging Israeli Mothers to Co-Observe "Sesame Street" with Their Five-Year-Olds
Salomon, G. (1977) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1128378 · Cited by 125
Parental mediation and rulemaking for adolescent use of television and VCRs
Lin, C. A., & Atkin, D. J. (1989) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838158909364061 · Cited by 116
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Ball S., 1970, The first year of Sesame Street: An evaluation.
- Cantor J., 1996, What parents want in a television rating system: Results from a national survey.
- Cronbach L. J., 1990, Essentials of psychological testing: Fifth Edition.
- Gallop G., 1989, San Francisco Chronicle, 84
- Krcmar M., 1998, The effects of family communication patterns on parents’ use of advisories and the V‐chip.
- Nunally J., 1978, Psychometric theory.
- Valkenburg P. M., 1997, Vierkante ogen: Opgroeien met TV en PC. [Square Eyes: Growing up with TV and PC]
- Van Lil J. E., 1995, Parental influences on children's television experience.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838150802437396 · Cited by 1,352
Putting Education in “Educational” Apps
Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/1529100615569721 · Cited by 1,305
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez‐Villanueva, F., Veltri, G., & Folkvord, F. (2017) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12277 · Cited by 776
Parental Mediation Theory for the Digital Age
Clark, L. S. (2011) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x · Cited by 728
How and Why Parents Guide the Media Use of Young Children
Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-66
- ISSN
- 0883-8151 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6878
- OpenAlex
- W2073540968
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 30.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
- Keywords
- restrictive mediation, scale development, children's television viewing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
