APPLICATIONS OF DATA MINING TECHNIQUES TO AUTOMATIC FROG IDENTIFICATION
Open accessAbstract
An intelligent frog call identifier is developed in this work to provide the public with easy online consultation. The raw frog call samples are first filtered by noise removal, high frequency compensation, and discrete wavelet transform techniques in that order. An adaptive end-point detection segmentation algorithm is proposed to effectively separate the individual syllables from the noise. Eight features, including spectral centroid, signal bandwidth, spectral roll-off, threshold-crossing rate, delta spectrum magnitude, spectral flatness, average energy, and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients are extracted and serve as the input parameters of the classifier. Three well-known classifiers, the kth nearest neighboring, a backpropagation neural network, and a naive Bayes classifier, are employed in this work for comparison. A series of experiments were conducted to measure the outcome performance of the proposed work. Experimental results show that the recognition rate of the k-nearest neighbor classifier with the parameters of mel-frequency cepstral coefficients can achieve up to 93.81%. The effectiveness of the proposed frog call identifier is thus verified.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deep learning models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have been developed to identify birds, bats or amphibians.
“More recently, artificial intelligence deep learning models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have been developed to identify birds, bats or amphibians36–40.”
From Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
Haykin, S. (1998) · Cited by 30,070 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Vapnik, V. N. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271368 · Cited by 27,236 · see citing works
De-noising by soft-thresholding
Donoho, D. L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.382009 · Cited by 9,655 · see citing works
Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation
Tadeusiewicz, R. (1995) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(95)90080-2 · Cited by 7,217 · see citing works
Duellman, W. E. (1994) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801847806 · Cited by 4,517 · see citing works
EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing
(2006) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2006.1657822 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Content-based audio classification and retrieval by support vector machines
Guo, G., & Li, S. Z. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2002.806626 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Kogan, J. A., & Margoliash, D. (1998) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.421364 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Bird species recognition using support vector machines
Fagerlund, S. (2007) · EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing · doi:10.1155/2007/38637 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Parametric Representations of Bird Sounds for Automatic Species Recognition
Somervuo, P. J., Härmä, A., & Fagerlund, S. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2006.872624 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
A robust algorithm for word boundary detection in the presence of noise
Junqua, J.-C., Mak, B. K.-W., & Reaves, B. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · doi:10.1109/89.294354 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Automatic identification of bird species based on sinusoidal modeling of syllables
Härmä, A. (2004) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2003.1200027 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Hybridizing the Genetic Algorithm and the K Nearest Neighbors Classification Algorithm.
Kelly, J. D., & Davis, L. D. (1991) · ICGA · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Effects of phase on the perception of intervocalic stop consonants
Liu, L., He, J., & Palm, G. (1997) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(97)00054-x · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Discrimination and Retrieval of Animal Sounds
Mitrović, D., Zeppelzauer, M., & Breiteneder, C. J. (2006) · International Multimedia Modelling Conference (MMM) · doi:10.1109/mmmc.2006.1651344 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Data Mining Applied to Acoustic Bird Species Recognition
Vilches, E., Escobar, I., Vallejo, E. E., & TAYLOR, C. E. (2006) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr.2006.426 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Phase and Amplitude Pre-Emphasis Techniques for Low-Power Serial Links
Buckwalter, J. F., Meghelli, M., Friedman, D. J., et al. (2006) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2006.874270 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Recovery of missing speech packets using the short-time energy and zero-crossing measurements
Erdöl, N., Castelluccia, C., & Zilouchian, A. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · doi:10.1109/89.232613 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
GA-facilitated KNN classifier optimization with varying similarity measures
Peterson, M. R., Doom, T. E., & Raymer, M. L. (2005) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2005.1555009 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Feature extracted from wavelet eigenfunction estimation for text-independent speaker recognition
Lung, S.-Y. (2004) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2003.01.003 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Robust word boundary detection using fuzzy logic
Beritelli, F. (2000) · Electronics Letters · doi:10.1049/el:20000601 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kogan, J. A. and D. Margoliash. 1998. Automated recognition of bird song elements from continuous recordings using DTW and HMMs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103(4):2185-2196.
- Tyagi, H., R. M. Hegde, H. A. Murthy, and A. Prabhakar. 2006. Automatic identification of bird calls using spectral ensemble average voiceprints. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Signal Processing Conference, Florence, Italy.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests
Müller, J., Mitesser, O., Schaefer, H. M., Seibold, S., Busse, A., Kriegel, P., Rabl, D., Gelis, R., Arteaga, A., Freile, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41693-w · Cited by 89 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huang, C.-J., Yang, Y.-J., Yang, D.-X., & Chen, Y.-J.
- Affiliations
- National Dong Hwa University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Chenn-Jung
- Venue
- Applied Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-07-31
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 553-569
- ISSN
- 0883-9514 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-6545
- OpenAlex
- W1978857057
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- bioacoustics, endpoint detection, noise reduction, discrete wavelet transform, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, audio feature extraction, k-nearest neighbors, BP neural network, Naive Bayes classifier, wildlife monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
