Cited by 276Music and Audio ProcessingAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Bird species recognition using support vector machines

Open access
Fagerlund, Seppo·2007·EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Abstract

Automatic identification of bird species by their vocalization is studied in this paper. Bird sounds are represented with two different parametric representations: (i) the mel-cepstrum parameters and (ii) a set of low-level signal parameters, both of which have been found useful for bird species recognition. Recognition is performed in a decision tree with support vector machine (SVM) classifiers at each node that perform classification between two species. Recognition is tested with two sets of bird species whose recognition has been previously tested with alternative methods. Recognition results with the proposed method suggest better or equal performance when compared to existing reference methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2007/38637

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classification of calls from different species and subspecies is robust.

    “Classification of calls from different species and subspecies is robust (Fagerlund, 2007;Kershenbaum et al., 2016)”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Fagerlund, 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. S. Fagerlund, "Automatic recognition of bird species by their sounds," M.S. thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Es- poo, Finland, 2004.
  2. J. C. Platt, N. Cristianini, and J. Shawe-Taylor, "Large margin dags for multiclass classification," in Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems 12, pp. 547-553, MIT Press, Cam- bridge, Mass, USA, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fagerlund, S.
Corresponding author
Fagerlund, Seppo
Venue
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
Published
2007-05-22
Volume
2007
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1110-8657 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-6180
OpenAlex
W2019432531
Cited by
276
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Academy of Finland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
bird identification, bird vocalizations, automatic species identification, mel-cepstrum, support vector machine, decision tree classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review