Cited by 101Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementEmployee Performance and Motivation

The Relationship between Psychological Climate and Salesperson‐Sales Manager Trust in Sales Organizations

Open access
Strutton, David, Pelton, Lou E., Lumpkin, James R.·1993·Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management

Abstract

It is imperative that salespeople gain and maintain the trust of prospects and clients. Similarly, the ability of management to develop and preserve trusting relationships with their salesforces exerts a critical influence on the success of sales organizations. The extent to which psychological climate of sales organizations influences the level of trust that salespersons place in their sales managers is investigated in this study. “Low-trust” and “high-trust” salespersons were distinguished by their significantly different perceptions of the levels of autonomy, cohesiveness, fairness, innovativeness, recognition and ethicality present which compose the psychological climate of their sales units. Recommendations regarding how sales managers can foster a trust-facilitating psychological climate are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08853134.1993.10753963

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both team trust and a collaborative culture enable better communication, information sharing, focus and greater co-operation, thereby leading to greater creative efforts.

    “Both team trust and a collaborative culture enable better communication, information sharing, focus and greater co-operation (Larson & LaFasto, 1989;Strutton, Pelton & Lumpkin, 1993;Calton & Lad, 1995;Littler, Leverick & Bruce, 1995;Whitener et al., 1998), thereby leading to greater creative efforts.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Lumpkin, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi (US)
  • James R. Lumpkin is the Gene Brauns Professor of Marketing at the University of Southwestern Louisiana. He has a B.S. in chemistry and an MBA in management, and received his Ph.D. in marketing from the University of Arkansas. Before entering academe, Dr. Lumpkin worked in marketing research for Phillips Petroleum Company. His primary research interests include retail patronage theory, market segmentation, and research methodology with recent research focused on the elderly consumer. His research has been published in the Journal of Retailing, Journal of Business Research, Gerontologist, Journal of Advertising Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Psychological Reports, and other scholarly journals.
Venue
Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management
Published
1993-01
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0885-3134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7813
OpenAlex
W2528105930
Cited by
101
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
Keywords
psychological climate, trust, salespeople, sales managers, sales organization, sales management, autonomy, cohesion, fairness, innovativeness, recognition, ethicality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review