The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of pupils with behaviour problems
Abstract
This study focuses on the social position and the degree of being bullied of pupils with behaviour problems fully included in regular education and on their teachers’ assessments on social integration and bullying. The study sample consisted of 25 9–12‐year‐old pupils with behaviour problems and their peers without special needs participating in full‐time regular education in the north of The Netherlands. Data gathering was performed using pupil and teacher questionnaires and a sociometric test. Results indicate that compared to their peers without special educational needs (SEN), the pupils with behaviour problems in this study were included less socially. The study further shows that about half the teachers participating in the study have a too positive view on the social position of these pupils. These teachers tend to seriously underestimate both the frequency with which pupils are being bullied and the frequency with which these pupils actively bully their peers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming
Lindsay, G. (2007) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709906x156881 · Cited by 725
Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten?
Stassen Berger, K. (2007) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002 · Cited by 578
Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & van Houten, E. (2009) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603110701284680 · Cited by 386
Self-citationSocial Participation of Students with Special Needs in Regular Primary Education in the Netherlands
Koster, M., Pijl, S. J., Nakken, H., & Van Houten, E. (2010) · International Journal of Disability, Development and Education · doi:10.1080/10349120903537905 · Cited by 294
Self-citationFrancis, B., Connolly, P., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Pepper, D., Sloan, S., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Travers, M.-C. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.09.001 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Monchy *, M. D., Pijl, S. J., & Zandberg, T.
- Venue
- European Journal of Special Needs Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-330
- ISSN
- 0885-6257 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-591X
- OpenAlex
- W2137949224
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of pupils with behaviour problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0885625042000262488
- The paper
- Monchy *, M. D., Pijl, S. J., & Zandberg, T. (2004). Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of pupils with behaviour problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0885625042000262488
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.