The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: international perspectives on placement
Abstract
This paper reports findings about placement questions relevant to disability in education. It is part of a larger international study of the perspectives of 132 education practitioners and administrators in England, the USA and The Netherlands to several dilemmas of difference. Participants were interviewed about their perspectives to a presented placement dilemma about the consequences of having inclusive/separate placements for children with more severe disabilities/special educational needs. The data are presented in quantitative terms (degrees of recognition and resolution of dilemma) and qualitative terms (reasons, justifications and suggested resolutions). The findings show the continued recognition of this dilemma and commonalities in the resolution of the dilemma across the countries. Variations in responses to the dilemmas that relate to national differences are also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Norwich (2008) points out that the process of working with diversity relates to dilemmas of identification, curriculum and location”
From Preservice teachers' reflections on diversity and on teaching diverse pupils in Norwegian compulsory school (2021) · cites this paper as Norwich (2008)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1177/002246699803200105 · DOI
- 2002, Special educational needs: A mainstream issue
- 10.1080/08856250210129056 · DOI
- Berlak A., 1981, Dilemmas of schooling: Teaching and social change
- Berlin I., 1990, The crooked timber of humanity
- Billig M., 1988, Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking
- 10.1080/08856250600600968 · DOI
- Dahl R.A., 1982, Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: Autonomy and control
- 1994, Code of practice on the identification and assessment of special educational needs
- 2002, SEN code of practice
- 2005, SEN in England 2005. National statistics: First release
- Drisko, J.W. Qualitative data analysis: It’s not just anything goes!. Paper presented at Society for Social Work and Research Conference. January30, Charleston, SC, USA.
- 10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00200 · DOI
- 2003, Special education across Europe
- Gray P., 2006, National audit of service, support and provision for children with low‐incidence SEN
- 2006, Special educational needs: Education and Skills Committee, 1
- 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00284.x · DOI
- 10.1177/07419325020230040401 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1981.tb00537.x · DOI
- MacBeath J., 2006, The costs of inclusion: Report for the NUT
- McClaughlin M., 2000, Special education in the 21st century: Issues of inclusion and reform
- Minow M., 1990, Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion and American law
- 10.1080/0305498930190408 · DOI
- Norwich B., 2007, Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: International perspectives, 10.4324/9780203938867 · DOI
- 10.1080/0885625910060202 · DOI
- Pijl Y.L., 1995, Pedagogische Studien, 72, 102
- 10.1080/08856250110040686 · DOI
- 10.1177/1741143205048176 · DOI
- Scheepstra A., 1999, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14, 212, 10.1080/0885625990140303 · DOI
- Terzi L., 2007, Categories in special education
- 2006, Data tables: Office for Special Education Programs (OSEP)
- 10.1080/0885625082000042294 · DOI
- Warnock M., 2005, Special educational needs: A new look
Cited by
Szumski, G., Smogorzewska, J., & Karwowski, M. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.02.004 · Cited by 214
Dilemas de la inclusión y discapacidad en la educación superior
Pérez Castro, J. (2022) · Perfiles Educativos · doi:10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2022.175.60179 · Cited by 18
KC, B. K., & Ohna, S. E. S. (2021) · Acta Didactica Norden · doi:10.5617/adno.7821 · Cited by 5
Educación inclusiva y educación especial en México: dilemas, relaciones y articulaciones
Cruz Vadillo, R., & Iturbide Fernández, P. (2023) · IE Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH · doi:10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v14i0.1617 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Norwich, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Norwich, Brahm
- ORCID
- Norwich, Brahm
- Venue
- European Journal of Special Needs Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 287-304
- ISSN
- 0885-6257 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-591X
- OpenAlex
- W2082147468
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 20.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Special Needs Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
- Keywords
- inclusive education, special educational needs, children with disabilities, placement decisions, cross-national comparison, England, Netherlands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
