Neurodiversity and higher education: double masking by neurodivergent students
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, third-level institutions have undergone a shift in how they perceive and engage with students whose educational needs do not align with traditional expectations. This is reflected in the growing emphasis on diversity, equity and inclusion across the sector, particularly concerning access and retention. The degree to which neurodiversity is incorporated within these frameworks varies across jurisdictions. However, research continues to highlight a gap between the rhetoric surrounding neurodiversity inclusion and the lived experiences of neurodivergent students. This paper explores these phenomena through the lens of the Global Café methodology, offering a participatory perspective on neurodivergent students’ lived experiences. The paper reports on data from three Global Café sessions conducted with a total of 18 participants. The findings highlight a distinct lack of understanding and knowledge around neurodivergence beyond the disability lens. Findings suggest the perpetuation of ableist/neurotypical approaches rather than any real paradigm shift in thought and practice. The implications for this are a system which, on the outside, appears to be making strides in terms of change, but in reality is creating an environment whereby students are required to navigate a system that overburdens them rather than facilitates them.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The perspectives and needs of neurodivergent people receive less sustained attention in discourse and practice than physical disabilities and technical standards.
“Discourse and practice often focus on physical disabilities and compliance with technical standards, while the perspectives and needs of neurodivergent people receive less sustained attention [1, 28, 40].”
From Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
The Discussion (page not available) says there is insufficient communication with the neurodivergent community, and the Introduction describes a gap between higher-education policies and students’ lived experiences and needs. The paper does not establish that physical disabilities or technical standards receive more attention, and its discussion is primarily about neurodivergent students in higher education rather than neurodivergent people generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613 · Cited by 6,543 · see citing works
Neurodiversity in higher education: a narrative synthesis
Clouder, L., Karakus, M., Cinotti, A., Ferreyra, M. V., Fierros, G. A., & Rojo, P. (2020) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00513-6 · Cited by 385 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…the availability of support services and technologies, there is often a disconnect between what is needed, what is provided, and the burden of accessing and securing such supports, moreover, this is exacerbated by fears of stigmatisation and labelling (Clouder et al. 2020; Griffin and Pollak 2009).”
‘Masking is life’: experiences of masking in autistic and nonautistic adults
Miller, D., Rees, J., & Pearson, A. (2021) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2020.0083 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis
Hamilton, L. G., & Petty, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093290 · Cited by 185 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This has led to a paradigm shift in various cultural, academic, and institutional contexts, including educational and therapeutic practices (Hamilton and Petty 2023; Jones and Orchard 2024).”
Pryke-Hobbes, A., Davies, J., Heasman, B., Livesey, A., Walker, A., Pellicano, E., & Remington, A. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290001 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Austin, R. D., and G. P. Pisano. 2017. "Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage." Harvard Business Review 95 (3): 96-103.
- Catala, A., L. Faucher, and P. Poirier. 2021. "Autism, Epistemic Injustice, and Epistemic Disablement: A Relational Account of Epistemic Agency." Synthese 199 (3-4): 9013-9039. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11229-021-03192-7 . · DOI
- Damianakis, T., and M. R. Woodford. 2012. "Qualitative Research with Small Connected Communities: Generating New Knowledge While Upholding Research Ethics." The Qualitative Health Research 22 (5): 708-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311431444 . · DOI
- Dwyer, P. 2022. "The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?" Human Development 66 (2): 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000523723 . · DOI · Paper page
- Estacio, E., and T. Karic. 2016. "The World Café: An Innovative Method to Facilitate Reflections on Internationalisation in Higher Education." Journal of Further and Higher Education 40 (6): 731-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014315 . · DOI
- Green, J. 2023. "Debate: Neurodiversity, Autism and Healthcare." Child and Adolescent Mental Health 28 (3): 438-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12663 . · DOI
- Griffin, E., and D. Pollak. 2009. "Student Experiences of Neurodiversity in Higher Education: Insights from the BRAINHE Project." Dyslexia 15 (1): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.383 . · DOI · Paper page
- Houting, J. 2018. "Neurodiversity: An insider's Perspective." Autism 23 (2): 271-273. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1362361318820762 . · DOI · Paper page
- Hull, L., K. V. Petrides, C. Allison, P. Smith, S. Baron-Cohen, M. C. Lai, and W. Mandy. 2017. ""Putting on My Best Normal": Social Camouflaging in Adults with Autism Spectrum Conditions." Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders 47 (8): 2519-2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3166-5 . · DOI · Paper page
- Jones, E., and V. Orchard. 2024. "Neurodiversity and Disability: What is at Stake?" Medical Humanities 50 (3): 456-465. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012808 . · DOI
- Legault, M., J. N. Bourdon, and P. Poirier. 2021. "From Neurodiversity to Neurodivergence: The Role of Epistemic and Cognitive Marginalization." Synthese 199 (5-6): 12843-12868. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11229-021-03356-5 . · DOI
- Mayer, Y., L. Nimmon, A. Weiss, L. Bulk, A. Battalova, T. Krupa, and T. Jarus. 2025. "Promoting Epistemic Justice: Supporting Inclusion and Belonging for Disabled Individuals in Health Professions." Nurse Education Today 147:106584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106584 . · DOI
- Mladenov, T., and I. Dimitrova. 2022. "Epistemic Injustice as a Bridge Between Medical Sociology and Disability Studies." Sociology of Health and Illness 45 (6): 1146-1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1467-9566.13479 . · DOI
- Morse, J. M. 2008. "What's Your Favorite Color? Reporting Irrelevant Demographics in Qualitative Research." The Qualitative Health Research 18 (3): 299-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1049732307310995 . · DOI · Paper page
- Pearson, A., and K. Rose. 2021. "A Conceptual Analysis of Autistic Masking: Understanding the Narrative of Stigma and the Illusion of Choice." Autism in Adulthood 3 (1): 52-60. https://doi. org/10.1089/aut.2020.0043 . · DOI · Paper page
- Quigley, E., M. O'Hanlon, M. Brandes, R. Kennedy, and B. Gavin. 2024. "Neurodiversity and Third-Level Education: A Lacuna Between the Strength-Based Paradigm Shift and the Lived Experience." Neurodiversity 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/27546330241277427 . · DOI
- Radulski, E. 2022. "Conceptualising Autistic Masking, Camouflaging, and Neurotypical Privilege: Towards a Minority Group Model of Neurodiversity." Human Development 66 (2): 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1159/000524122 . · DOI
- Rodríguez, G., C. González, T. Villaseñor-Cabrera, and M. De Los Dolores Valadez Sierra. 2024. "University Experiences of Students and Graduates with Neurodiversity: Tools for Creating a Specialized Mentoring Program Related to Working Life." Frontiers in Education. https://doi. org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1432930 . · DOI
- Rosqvist, H., M. Botha, K. Hens, S. O'Donoghue, A. Pearson, and A. Stenning. 2022. "Cutting Our Own Keys: New Possibilities of Neurodivergent Storying in Research." Autism 27 (5): 1235-1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221132107 . · DOI
- Rosqvist, H., E. Hjorth, and A. Nygren. 2023. "Meeting Up in Broken Word/Times: Communication, Temporality and Pace in Neuromixed Writing." Medical Humanities 49 (3): 407-415. https://doi. org/10.1136/medhum-2022-012384 . · DOI · Paper page
- Salvatore, S., C. White, and S. Podowitz-Thomas. 2024. "'Not a Cookie Cutter Situation': How Neurodivergent Students Experience Group Work in Their STEM Courses.' International Journal of STEM Education 11 (1): 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00508-0 . · DOI
- Sedgewick, F., L. Hull, and H. Ellis. 2022. "Autism and Masking." https://doi.org/10.5040/ 9781805015918 . · DOI
- Stanich, A. 2024. "All the World's a (Neurotypical) Stage: Neurodivergent Folklore, Autistic Masking, and Virtual Spaces for Discussing Autistic Identity." The Journal of American Folklore 137 (545): 293-307. https://doi.org/10.5406/15351882.137.545. · DOI
- Tan, S., and J. Brown. 2005. "The World Café in Singapore." The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 41 (1): 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304272851 . · DOI
- Taneja, D., P. Viswanathan, and S. Rajan. 2024. "Navigating Neurodiversity in Higher Education in India." eLife 13:13. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104071 . · DOI
- Verbeek, L., M. Koning, and A. Schippers. 2024. "Understanding Epistemic Justice Through Inclusive Research About Intellectual Disability and Sexuality." Social Sciences 13 (8): 408. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/socsci13080408. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education
Hermann, J., Jansen, N., Richter, U., Fleer, A., & Doganün, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 25th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3769994.3770007 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Discourse and practice often focus on physical disabilities and compliance with technical standards, while the perspectives and needs of neurodiver-gent people receive less sustained attention [1, 28, 40].”
- Authors
- Quigley, E., & Gallagher, T.
- Affiliations
- Maynooth University
- National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
- ORCID
- Quigley, Etain
- Venue
- European Journal of Special Needs Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-05-30
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 286-302
- ISSN
- 0885-6257 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-591X
- OpenAlex
- W4410898162
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 20.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Special Needs Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Teaching and Learning Fellowship, Maynooth University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- neurodiversity, neurodivergent students, higher education, double masking, disability identity, ableism, diversity, equity, and inclusion, student access and retention, lived experience, participatory research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review