Cited by 321Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

‘Masking is life’: experiences of masking in autistic and nonautistic adults

Open access
Miller, Danielle, Rees, Jon, Pearson, Amy·2021·Autism in Adulthood

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Autistic masking is an emerging research area, and so far, research has suggested that masking has a negative effect on autistic people. Masking relates to general social practices (such as identity management) and is often driven by stigma avoidance. Many nonautistic people also experience stigma that might drive them to suppress aspects of their identity. In this study, we investigate similarities and differences in experiences of masking in autistic and nonautistic people. Methods: = 45) recruited via social media. We used thematic analysis to analyze responses to open-ended items about masking, using an inductive approach, at a semantic level, with a critical realist paradigm. Results: Thematic analysis revealed that some aspects of masking are shared across autistic and nonautistic people, such as utilizing mimicry of others as a social strategy or feeling exhausted from masking. All groups reported that masking made them feel disconnected from their true sense of identity and had a negative effect on them. Other aspects of masking seemed more specific to autistic people, such as sensory suppression, and masking leading to suicidal ideation. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that many aspects of masking are experienced across different neurotypes and are likely related to outside perceptions of difference and stigma. It is likely that what we call "autistic masking" is similar to other forms of stigma management previously theorized. Some aspects of masking do seem more specific to the autistic neurotype (e.g., suppression of stimming) and should be explored further to provide support for autistic people recovering from the negative impact of masking. Lay summary: ADHD as these things might affect their experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/aut.2020.0083

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cumulative past experiences evoking feelings of threat and shame incentivise masking behaviour, which is increasingly recognised as a driver of poor mental health in neurodivergent people.

    “Cumulative past experiences evoking feelings of threat and shame incentivise masking behaviour (e.g., suppressing stimming, forcing eye contact, copying others’ behaviours) which is increasingly recognised as a driver of poor mental health in neurodivergent people (Miller et al., 2021).”

    From Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2021

    The Results (‘External Influences’) describe learning to mimic others to avoid harassment, and the Discussion identifies self-protection and fear of repercussions as motives for masking. The Results (‘Neurotype Nuances’) document suppressing stimming; the Methods give forcing eye contact as an example. The Discussion links masking to mental-health difficulties, but does not establish it as a causal driver across neurodivergent people or specifically identify cumulative experiences of threat and shame as the motive. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Working from home may reduce the need for 'masking', i.e. the suppression of neuro-divergent traits and behaviours that may serve as a form of impression management.

    “Working from home (WFH) may also reduce the need for 'masking', i.e. the suppression of neuro-divergent traits and behaviours that may serve as a form of impression management [16] and can be exhausting and stressful [17].”
  • Neuro-divergent people feel pressure to 'mask' neuro-divergent traits and behaviours in the workplace, which can be exhausting.

    “Previous research suggests neuro-divergent people feel pressure to 'mask' neuro-divergent traits and behaviours in the workplace, which can be exhausting [17].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [5]5. Karmiloff-Smith A, Thomas MSC. Developmental disorders. In: Arbib MA, ed. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks (2nd Edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002;339–342. [Google Scholar]
  2. [7]7. Chapman R. Defining neurodiversity for research and practice. In: Stenning, Chown and Bertlisdottir-Rosqvist (eds). Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm. Oxford, Routledge; 2020;14. [Google Scholar]
  3. [8]8. Singer J. Why can't you be normal for once in your life? From a ‘Problem with no Name'to a new category of disability. Disabil Discourse. 1999:59–67. [Google Scholar]
  4. [9]9. Milton D. A Mismatch of Salience: Explorations of the Nature of Autism from Theory to Practice. Pavilion Press; 2017. https://www.pavpub.com/a-mismatch-of-salience/ [Google Scholar]
  5. [12]12. Willey LH. Pretending to Be Normal: Living with Asperger's Syndrome (Autism Spectrum Disorder) Expanded Edition. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. [25]25. Milton D, Moon L. The normalisation agenda and the psycho-emotional disablement of autistic people. Auton Crit J Interdiscip Autism Stud. 2012;1(1). [Google Scholar]
  7. [31]31. Botha M. Autistic community connectedness as a buffer against the effects of minority stress. [Doctoral Thesis]. Surrey, UK: University of Surrey; 2020. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/854098/7/Autistic Community Connectedness as a Buffer Against Minority Stress - M Botha.pdf
  8. [38]38. Tajfel H, Turner JC, Austin WG, Worchel S. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organ Identity A Read. 1979;56:65. [Google Scholar]
  9. [44]44. Fulton R, Reardon E, Kate R, Jones R. Sensory Trauma: Autism, Sensory Difference and the Daily Experience of Fear. 1st edition. Autism Wellbeing CIC; 2020. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, D., Rees, J., & Pearson, A.
Affiliations
University of Sunderland (GB)
Corresponding author
Pearson, Amy
Venue
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2021-12-01
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
330-338
ISSN
  • 2573-9581 (ISSN-L)
  • 2573-959X
OpenAlex
W3162613655
Cited by
321
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 2
FWCI
18.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism in Adulthood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, stigma management, identity management, mimicry, sensory suppression, stimming, suicidal ideation, neurodiversity, stigma avoidance, autistic adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review