CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 125Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchHealth and Wellbeing Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of the role of self-efficacy and illness representations in relation to dietary self-care and diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Nouwen, Arie, Urquhart Law, G., Hussain, Shakir, McGovern, Steven, Napier, Heidi·2009·Psychology & Health
DOI 10.1080/08870440802254597
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined the joint effects of self-efficacy and illness representations on dietary self-care and diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes by comparing two theoretical models: the Self-regulation Model (Leventhal, H., Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common-sense representations of illness danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Medical Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 7-30). New York: Pergamon.) and Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.). One hundred and fifty-one adolescents with type 1 diabetes completed self-report measures of dietary self-efficacy, illness representations, dietary self-care and diabetes distress. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling. The model best supported by the data (Leventhal's Self-regulation Model) showed that dietary self-efficacy, perceived consequences and treatment effectiveness had direct and independent effects on both dietary self-care and diabetes distress. Together with dietary self-efficacy, perceived short-term treatment effectiveness was a significant predictor of dietary self-care. Age was found to be a negative predictor of short-term treatment effectiveness beliefs. Diabetes distress was best predicted by self-efficacy and perceived consequences. It can be concluded that to target effectively dietary self-care and distress, clinicians should focus on key illness representation variables (perceived short-term treatment effectiveness and perceived consequences) in conjunction with self-efficacy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870440802254597

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bandura , A . 2000 . “ Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organisational effectiveness ” . In Handbook of principles of organisational behavior , Edited by: Locke , EA . Oxford : Blackwell .
  2. Leventhal , H , Meyer , D and Nerenz , D . 1980 . “ The common-sense representations of illness danger ” . In Medical Psychology , Edited by: Rachman , S . Vol. 2 , 7 – 30 . New York : Pergamon .
  3. Muthén , LK and Muthén , BO . 1998–2006 . Mplus user's guide, , 4th , Los Angeles, CA : Muthén & Muthén .
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.472 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–125 of 125

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nouwen, A., Urquhart Law, G., Hussain, S., McGovern, S., & Napier, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Birmingham
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Nouwen, Arie
ORCID
Venue
Psychology & Health
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-10-27
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1071-1084
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
DOI
10.1080/08870440802254597
OpenAlex
W2150970718
Cited by
125
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, adolescents, self-efficacy, illness representations, dietary self-care, diabetes distress, self-regulation model, social cognitive theory, perceived consequences, perceived treatment effectiveness, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Stress, Psychological, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review