Cited by 65Cancer survivorship and careFamily Support in IllnessAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Psychological intervention with couples coping with breast cancer: a systematic review

Open access
Brandão, Tânia, Schulz, Marc S., Matos, Paula Mena·2014·Psychology & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Information about psychological intervention with couples coping with breast cancer is not well-disseminated. This can be explained, at least in part, by the absence of knowledge about the efficacy of this kind of intervention. The aim of the present systematic review is to identify and describe psychological interventions for couples coping with breast cancer and evaluate their efficacy. DESIGN: Studies identified by a searching multiple literature databases related to health and psychology between 1975 and 2013. Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were utilised. RESULTS: Of 129 abstracts, 13 were extracted for further analysis and a final ten studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted from each study regarding study sample characteristics, design, results and methodological limitations. The results obtained were mixed in regard to efficacy, although the overwhelming majority of studies (eight studies) found benefits for both women and their partners in some dimensions, such as quality of life, psychological distress, relationship functioning and physical symptoms associated with cancer. CONCLUSION: Psychological interventions for couples coping with breast cancer appear to be effective for both women and their partners. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of couple-based interventions and, to identify for whom and how they are more effective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2013.859257

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (pp. 110-131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Caress, A. L., Chalmers,K., & Luker, K. (2009). A narrative review of interventions to support family carers who provide physical care to family members with cancer. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 1516-1527.
  3. Elliot, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C. & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Empathy. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (pp. 132-152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Wiesenthal, N. L. (2006). Posttraumatic growth in a cognitive behavioral couple intervention for women with early stage breast cancer. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brandão, T., Schulz, M. S., & Matos, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Bryn Mawr College (US)
Corresponding author
Matos, Paula Mena
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2013-11-27
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
491-516
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W1989014117
Cited by
65
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositório Institucional da Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa (Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/84436/2012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
breast cancer, couples, psychological intervention, couple-based interventions, coping, quality of life, psychological distress, relationship functioning, intervention efficacy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review