The DOI matches its Crossref record; 215 of the 215 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to systematically review the use and performance of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ). DESIGN: Electronic databases were searched for papers administering the Brief IPQ published in peer-reviewed journals. Data were extracted from the results for meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use by illness population, country, language and study design. The questionnaire's concurrent validity, predictive validity, sensitivity to change, discriminant validity and mean scores for different populations were summarised. RESULTS: The review included 188 papers. The Brief IPQ has been administered to patients from age 8 to over 80, with a wide range of illnesses, in 26 languages from 36 countries. Pooled correlations between illness perceptions and depression, anxiety, blood glucose levels and quality of life were consistent with previous research and theory (range .25-.49 for consequences, identity and emotional representations; -.12 to -.27 for personal control). All items were able to predict some outcomes up to one-year follow-up. Each subscale demonstrated sensitivity to change after intervention in randomised controlled trials with the personal control and causal items showing most frequent change. CONCLUSIONS: The Brief IPQ is widely used and has good psychometric properties. More studies should include and analyse the causal item.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–215 of 215
Vinaccia, S., & Quiceno, J. M. (2011) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 10
Molloy, G. J., Sniehotta, F. F., & Johnston, M. (2008) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440701684548 · Cited by 10
Prior, M. E., Burr, J. M., Ramsay, C. R., Jenkinson, D., Campbell, S. E., Francis, J., & for the Glaucoma screening Platform Study group (2012) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000710 · Cited by 8
Kaptein, A. A., Hughes, B. M., Scharloo, M., Hondebrink, N., & Langeveld, T. P. M. (2010) · Clinical Otolaryngology · doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02070.x · Cited by 8
ENDLEY, L., & Berry, K. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01683.x · Cited by 7
Marques, M. M., Gucht, V. D., Leal, I. M. P., & Stan Maes, A. (2012) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-012-9265-y · Cited by 7
Rahimi, Z., Sfandyar, B., & Zahra, Z. (2012) · Journal of Critical Care Nursing · Cited by 7
Predictors of Substance Use Among Black Urban Adolescents with Asthma: A Longitudinal Assessment
Weekes, J. C., Cotton, S., & McGrady, M. E. (2011) · Journal of the National Medical Association · doi:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30335-7 · Cited by 7
Influence of dietary therapy appraisal on future perceived control of type 2 diabetes
Shibayama, T., Sato, E., Nishigaki, M., Ochiai, R., & Kazuma, K. (2011) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105311401770 · Cited by 6
Evaluating a health behaviour model for persons with and without an intellectual disability
Brehmer‐Rinderer, B., Zigrovic, L., & Weber, G. (2013) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.12046 · Cited by 6
Misconceptions and Illness Perceptions in Cardiac Patients and Their Spouses: A Pilot Study
Figueiras, M. J., Monteiro, R., & Caeiro, R. (2012) · Psychology Community & Health · doi:10.5964/pch.v1i3.24 · Cited by 5
Giardini, A., Pierobon, A., Majani, G., et al. (2013) · PubMed · Cited by 5
Gercovich, D., López, P. L., Bortolato, D., Margiolakis, P., Morgenfeld, M., Rosell, L., & Deza, E. G. (2012) · Psicooncología · doi:10.5209/rev_psic.2013.v9.n2-3.40911 · Cited by 3
de Oliveira, D., & Pereira, M. G. (2013) · Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology · doi:10.30849/rip/ijp.v46i3.297 · Cited by 1
Davoudi, I., Honarmand, M. M., Elahe, S., & Sararoudi, R. B. (2012) · Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī-i Māzandarān/Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- *Afshar H., 2011, Journal of Isfahan Medical School, 29, 526
- *Berry K., 2010, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 39
- 10.1111/sjop.2012.53.issue-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/bjhp.2011.16.issue-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/imj.2006.36.issue-10 · DOI
- 10.1111/jrh.2008.25.issue-1 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pon.304 · DOI
- *Davoudi I., 2012, Journal of the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 21, 294
- *Gercovich D., 2012, Psicooncologia, 9, 403
- *Giardini A., 2012, Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, 34, B38
- *Kalantari H., 2012, Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 22, 33
- 10.1111/coa.2010.35.issue-1 · DOI
- *Lin Y. P., 2011, Journal of the Oriental Institute of Technology, 31, 147
- 10.1111/bjc.2013.52.issue-1 · DOI
- *Oliveira D., 2012, Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 46, 357
- 10.1111/bjhp.2012.17.issue-1 · DOI
- *Rahimi J., 2012, Iranian Journal of Critical Care Nursing, 5, 151
- 10.1111/ijn.2013.19.issue-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/sjop.2012.53.issue-3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Laferton, J. A. C., Kube, T., Salzmann, S., Auer, C. J., & Shedden-Mora, M. C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233 · Cited by 267
Skapinakis, P., Bellos, S., Oikonomou, A., Dimitriadis, G., Gkikas, P., Perdikari, E., & Mavreas, V. (2020) · Depression Research and Treatment · doi:10.1155/2020/3158954 · Cited by 133
Measurement of psychological adjustment to diabetes with the diabetes acceptance scale
Schmitt, A., Reimer, A., Kulzer, B., Icks, A., Paust, R., Roelver, K.-M., Kaltheuner, M., Ehrmann, D., Krichbaum, M., Haak, T., et al. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.01.005 · Cited by 53
Carletto, S., Tesio, V., Borghi, M., Francone, D., Scavelli, F., Bertino, G., Malucchi, S., Bertolotto, A., Oliva, F., Torta, R., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02083 · Cited by 49
Haines, C., Loades, M., & Davis, C. (2019) · Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1359104519829796 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Broadbent, E., Wilkes, C., Koschwanez, H., Weinman, J., Norton, S., & Petrie, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Broadbent, Elizabeth
- Venue
- Psychology & Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-08-26
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1361-1385
- ISSN
- 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8321
- OpenAlex
- W1617647287
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 215
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- kclpure.kcl.ac.uk
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- The University of Auckland (Summer Studentship)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, illness perception, psychometric properties, concurrent validity, predictive validity, sensitivity to change, discriminant validity, personal control, depression, anxiety, quality of life, blood glucose
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic Self Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
