Cited by 56Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMental Health and Patient InvolvementHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Developing successful social support: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of mechanisms and processes in a chronic pain support group

Finlay, Katherine A., Peacock, Sue, Elander, James·2018·Psychology & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The experience of long-term membership of a successful chronic pain support group (CPSG) was explored to identify; (i) factors associated with social support, and; (ii) ways that health care professionals (HCPs) could help CPSGs become more effective and supportive. DESIGN: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis enabled exploration of participants' experiences of membership and rationales for continued attendance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Twelve participants (four males, eight females), recruited from a regional CPSG, completed semi-structured interviews lasting from 45 to 120 minutes. Following verbatim transcription, idiographic then cross-case analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: Three superordinate themes emerged: (1) Investing in the new normal; (2) The nurturing environment; (3) Growth facilitation through social evolution. Increased investment and identification with membership, generated snowballing social engagement, enhancing pain management/well-being through collective humour and peer-to-peer support. Explicit guidance by HCPs in early stages of group formation/development, and subsequent implicit influences on group attitudes and actions, promoted the group's development into its current healthy, supportive state. CONCLUSION: Contrary to stereotypes, membership offered positive respite from chronic pain through collective coping. Successful CPSGs forge an independent identity, fostering strong group investment and an ability to live well with chronic pain. HCPs can provide a stabilising foundation for CPSGs to develop positively and supportively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2017.1421188

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Osborn, M., & Smith, J. A. (1998). The experience of chronic benign lower back pain: An interpretative phenomenological anslysis. British Journal of Health Psychology , 3 , 65-83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finlay, K. A., Peacock, S., & Elander, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Buckingham (GB)
  • Milton Keynes Hospital (GB)
  • University of Derby (GB)
Corresponding author
Finlay, Katherine A.
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2018-01-04
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
846-871
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2781651444
Cited by
56
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Buckingham E-Archive of Research (University of Buckingham) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
The Dennison Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
chronic pain, support groups, social support, peer support, healthcare workers, group facilitation, group development, coping, well-being, lived experience
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Qualitative Research, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review