Cited by 59Spinal Cord Injury ResearchPain Management and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Living with chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of community experience

Hearn, Jasmine H., Cotter, Imogen, Fine, Philip, A. Finlay, Katherine·2015·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article presents an in-depth, idiographic study examining the lived experience of chronic pain following spinal cord injury (SCI). Neuropathic pain (NP) occurs in a large majority of the SCI population and is particularly intractable to treatment. It can be both psychologically and physically debilitating. This study examines how the experience of NP is mediated by its meaning to the sufferer. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight people with SCI and chronic NP, attending outpatient clinics at a specialist SCI Centre in the UK. Verbatim transcripts were subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis to further understand the experience. RESULTS: Analysis suggested that NP has powerful consequences upon the sufferer's physical, psychological and social well-being, in line with a biopsychosocial understanding of pain. Three super-ordinate themes were identified: a perceived gap between treatments received and participants' views of what they wanted and needed; a fight for life control and acceptance; and feeling understood by others with SCI, but isolated from the non-understanding able-bodied. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in terms of the possible application of acceptance-based therapy to NP and the potential for the alleviation of the debilitating consequences of NP. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Chronic NP after SCI is often described as worse than the injury itself, often impacting upon the sufferers physical and psychological health. The experiences of persons with SCI-specific NP highlight the impact of pain on their physical, psychological and social health. This indicates that healthcare professionals should incorporate a biopsychosocial approach for managing pain post-SCI. Routine clinical follow-up of SCI patients with chronic NP, as well as comprehensive pain management treatment programmes, could address the three themes evidenced in the current study, by moving routine intervention with NP away from pain relief, towards pain management. Continued education for patients, friends, family members and healthcare professionals may be beneficial in promoting understanding and awareness of NP and its consequences following SCI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2014.1002579

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative evidence suggests that people with spinal cord injury want better access to psychological interventions.

    “Indeed, qualitative evidence suggests that people with SCI want better access to psychological interventions [5]”

    From Mindfulness for pain, depression, anxiety, and quality of life in people with spinal cord injury: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [5]

    The discussion (p. 21) says participants wanted treatment that acknowledged their distress and life restrictions, and suggests acceptance-based therapies as a possible intervention. It does not establish that participants specifically wanted better access to psychological interventions; that is the authors’ proposed response, not a reported request. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]44. Clarke AM. In First National Conference of the Spinal Network. Christchurch, New Zealand 2001.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hearn, J. H., Cotter, I., Fine, P., & A. Finlay, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Buckingham (GB)
  • Stoke Mandeville Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hearn, Jasmine H.
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2015-01-20
Volume
37
Issue
23
Pages
2203-2211
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2018808490
Cited by
59
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Buckingham E-Archive of Research (University of Buckingham) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic neuropathic pain, spinal cord injury, lived experience, biopsychosocial model of pain, acceptance-based therapy, pain management, treatment expectations, social isolation, psychological well-being, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Patient Discharge, Quality of Life, Spinal Cord Injuries, Patient Satisfaction, Qualitative Research, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review