The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research
Abstract
This study examines 83 IS qualitative studies in leading IS journals for the following purposes: (a) identifying the extent to which IS qualitative studies employ best practices of justifying sample size; (b) identifying optimal ranges of interviews for various types of qualitative research; and (c) identifying the extent to which cultural factors (such as journal of publication, number of authors, world region) impact sample size of interviews. Little or no rigor for justifying sample size was shown for virtually all of the IS studies in this dataset. Furthermore, the number of interviews conducted for qualitative studies is correlated with cultural factors, implying the subjective nature of sample size in qualitative IS studies. Recommendations are provided for minimally acceptable practices of justifying sample size of interviews in qualitative IS studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, in alignment with criteria provided by Marshall, Cardon, Poddar, and Fontenot (2013), saturation was obtained when the coding frame remained constant and analytic memos provided no additional insight.”
From Methodological Deficiencies in the Expert Testimony of Forensic Accountants: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Judicial Statements Pertaining to Daubert Exclusions (2021) · cites this paper as Marshall, Cardon, Poddar, and Fontenot, 2013
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903 · Cited by 20,808
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Sample size in qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (1995) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211 · Cited by 4,372
The Significance of Saturation
Morse, J. M. (1995) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239500500201 · Cited by 2,663
Decentralization in wikipedia governance.
Forte, A., Larco, V., & Bruckman, A. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260103 · Cited by 300 · cited 1×
“Fort, Larco, and Bruckman [11] stated, “When themes began arising over and over in these interviews, we followed up by recruiting participants who have been involved in particular issues and policies” (p. 54).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Amin M., 2000, Perspectives in Publishing, 1, 1
- 10.1177/1468794107085301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00250.x · DOI
- Charmaz K., 2005, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 507
- Cheek J., 2005, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 387
- Creswell J. W., 2007, Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches
- Denzin N. K., 2005, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 1
- 10.2307/30036550 · DOI · Paper page
- Garud R., 2005, MIS Quarterly, 29, 9, 10.2307/25148666 · DOI
- Glaser B. G., 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory.
- 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00175.x · DOI
- Havelka D., 2009, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50, 106
- Huang E. Y., 2009, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50, 65
- 10.2307/249133 · DOI
- Kaplan B., 2006, Evaluating the organizational impact of healthcare information systems, 30
- Kuzel A. J., 1999, Doing Qualitative Research, 33
- 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Miles M. B., 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis
- 10.1177/104973200129118183 · DOI
- 10.1177/1049732302238744 · DOI
- 10.2307/249422 · DOI
- 10.2307/249540 · DOI
- 10.2753/MIS0742-1222220308 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00768.x · DOI
- Patton M. Q., 2002, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods
- Richardson L., 2005, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 959
- 10.1080/07421222.2000.11518264 · DOI
- Strauss A., 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
- Subramanian G. H., 2010, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50, 130
- 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240101 · DOI
- Tan W., 2009, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50, 1
- Thomson S. B., 2010, “Grounded theory — sample size and validity,”
- 10.1057/ejis.1995.9 · DOI · Paper page
- Watson-Manheim M. B., 2007, MIS Quarterly, 31, 267, 10.2307/25148791 · DOI
- Yin R., 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,002
ChatGPT between opportunities and challenges: an empirical study in Italy
Pasca, M. G., & Arcese, G. (2024) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-08-2023-0268 · Cited by 25
Service robots in organisational frontlines—A retail managers’ perspective
Meyer, P., Roth, A., & Gutknecht, K. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103173 · Cited by 22
Himler, P., Lee, G. T., Rhon, D., Young, J., Cook, C. E., & Rentmeester, C. (2023) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102722 · Cited by 18
Majeed, S., Kim, W., & Ryu, K. (2022) · Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism · doi:10.1080/1528008x.2022.2135058 · Cited by 18
“Marshall et al. (2013) document that 15 to 30 interviews are an appropriate number of responses for a single case study.”
BackgroundEdwards, J. G., Barry, M., Essam, D. L., Elsayed, M., Abdulkarim, M., Elhossein, B. M. A., Mohammed, Z. H. A., Elnogomi, A., Elfaki, A., Elsayed, A., et al. (2021) · Global Health Research and Policy · doi:10.1186/s41256-021-00222-2 · Cited by 18
Occupational commitment of women working in SET: The impact of coping self‐efficacy and mentoring
Blaique, L., & Pinnington, A. (2021) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12405 · Cited by 18
Female Engineers’ Happiness and Productivity in Organizations with Paternalistic Culture
Chew, Y. T., Atay, E., & Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2020) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001834 · Cited by 27
Alonso, A. D., & Kok, S. (2020) · doi:10.1080/14778238.2020.1762254 · Cited by 18
“Marshall et al. (2013) suggest that no general agreement exists on the number of interviews at which saturation occurs.”
BackgroundRedmond, J., & Sharafizad, J. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102452 · Cited by 23
“What We Have in Common”: A Qualitative Analysis of Shared Experience in Peer-Delivered Services
Stefancic, A., House, S., Bochicchio, L. A., Harney-Delehanty, B., Osterweil, S., & Cabassa, L. (2019) · Community mental health journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-019-00391-y · Cited by 18
“While the sample size was small, it is consistent with prior literature, which can be used as one indicator of whether the volume of data collected could be adequate for addressing particular questions in context (Marshall et al. 2013).”
Glonti, K., & Hren, D. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020568 · Cited by 26
“saturation Saturation is a core guiding principle to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet few qualitative studies report in detail on the parameters that influenced saturation in their studies.(27) In this study, we will adopt the seven parameters outlined by Hennink et al that influence saturation(28)…”
MethodCapabilities and metrics in DevOps: A design science study
Amaro, R., Pereira, R., & da Silva, M. M. (2023) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2023.103809 · Cited by 21
Beyond Consultation: Rethinking Stakeholder Engagement in Qatar’s Public Education Policymaking
Al-Thani, G. (2025) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15060769 · Cited by 17
The autonomy paradox, working from home and psychosocial hazards
Vassiley, A., Shafaei, A., Nejati, M., Onnis, L., & Bentley, T. A. (2025) · Journal of Industrial Relations · doi:10.1177/00221856251315859 · Cited by 21
“In the same vein, Marshall et al. (2013) proposed a range of 15 to 30 respondents would be suf fi cient to be involved in case studies, and Ritchie et al. (2003) state that sample size for qualitative studies is often around 50.”
Value co-creation by interactive AI in fashion E-commerce
Ranjan, A., & Upadhyay, A. K. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2440127 · Cited by 14
“Marshall et al. (2013) indicated that a sample size of 20 to 30 is sufficient for qualitative studies that employ grounded theory. in the need for new insights, the qualitative researcher stopped interviewing individuals after saturation was reached. after the 22nd interview, there were no…”
López, C., Davidoff, A., Luco, F., Humeres, M., & Correa, T. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2356910 · Cited by 17
“Marshall et al. (2013) observe that qualitative studies involving more than 30 participants seldom provide extra advantages and are challenging to manage, leading us to target this number.”
The potential of collaborative housing to tackle the social deficit of housing: the Chilean case
Cortés-Urra, V., Ersoy, A., Czischke, D., & Gruis, V. (2024) · Journal of Housing and the Built Environment · doi:10.1007/s10901-023-10094-2 · Cited by 17
“We followed the sample size for phenomenological studies proposed by Guest et al. (2006) and Marshall et al. (2013).”
Heritage hotels: An exploration of staff experiences in these unique hospitality environments
Marghany, M., Morgan, N., Finniear, J., & White, P. (2023) · Tourism and Hospitality Research · doi:10.1177/14673584231215707 · Cited by 21
“Whilst a sample size of 15 to 20 respondents is ideal for qualitative research (Guest et al., 2006; Marshall et al., 2013), the number of interviews was not predetermined.”
Problem areas of determining the sample size in qualitative research: a model proposal
Tutar, H., Şahin, M., & Sarkhanov, T. (2023) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/qrj-06-2023-0099 · Cited by 24
Jiang, G., & Yang, W. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4230200 · Cited by 17
Paoletti, P., Perasso, G., Lillo, C., Serantoni, G., Maculan, A., Vianello, F., & di Giuseppe, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122264 · Cited by 17
“However, sample size standards in qualitative research are linked to historical and cultural factors related to the target sample (Marshall et al., 2013).”
BackgroundEffective Instructional Leadership Practices in High Performing Elementary Schools
Sanchez, J., & Watson, J. (2021) · Journal of school administration research and development · doi:10.32674/jsard.v6i2.3975 · Cited by 17
“According to Marshall et al. (2013), qualitative studies of the studied population generally contain 14 to 30 interviews.”
BackgroundBožič, K., Bachkirov, A. A., & Černe, M. (2021) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.006 · Cited by 30
Social worker attitudes toward parents with intellectual disabilities in Israel
Gur, A., & Stein, M. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1537382 · Cited by 17
“Sample size in this study fits the notion that qualitative studies generally include 20–30 interviews [47,48].”
Making dairy supply chains robust against corruption risk: a systemic exploratory study
Liu, X., Arthanari, T., & Shi, Y.-Y. (2019) · International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-02-2018-0039 · Cited by 17
How to increase the loyalty of public library users? A qualitative study
Tajedini, O., Khasseh, A. A., Afzali, M., & Sadatmoosavi, A. (2019) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/0961000619856081 · Cited by 23
“This stage involves drawing a diagram, called a coding graph (Marshall et al., 2013), which is derived from the Corbin and Strauss (2008) qualitative analysis process.”
MethodTichagwa, C. G. (2016) · doi:10.1080/0376835x.2015.1113125 · Cited by 17
Implementing a patient-initiated review system in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative evaluation
Child, S., Goodwin, V., Perry, M. G., Gericke, C., & Byng, R. (2015) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0837-9 · Cited by 17
“A provisional sample size of up to twenty five participants was proposed in order to achieve data saturation [7].”
BackgroundInteractions between cetaceans and artisanal fishermen from Ilhéus, Bahia - Brazil
Seminara, C., Barbosa-Filho, M. L., & Pendu, Y. L. (2019) · Biota Neotropica · doi:10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0742 · Cited by 17
Consumers¡¯ Perceptions of Green Marketing in the Hotel Industry
Punitha, S., Aziz, Y. A., & Rahman, A. A. (2016) · Asian Social Science · doi:10.5539/ass.v12n1p1 · Cited by 17
Boldi, A., Rapp, A., & Birk, M. (2024) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2423343 · Cited by 16
“The sample size aligns with the standard of qualitative research (Marshall et al., 2013), which tends to involve a small number of participants to enable in-depth data analysis (Ritchie et al., 2003; Vasileiou et al., 2018).”
Ugwu, U., Rappa, N., & Wong, K. K. W. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2412069 · Cited by 16
City Managers as Digital Transformation Leaders: Exploratory and Explanatory Notes
Sanina, A. G. (2024) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2024.2302059 · Cited by 15
“Although this number fits the proven rules of qualitative research (Malterud et al., 2016; Marshall et al., 2013), a larger sample would provide more information.”
Swarnakar, V., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Bhat, S., & Antony, J. (2023) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-07-2023-0201 · Cited by 27
Mensah, R. O., Mensah, P., & Opoku, D. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2285623 · Cited by 16
“However, a general guideline aims for a sample size of at least 10–30 participants for phenomenological studies to ensure that the data collected are sufficiently rich and varied (Marshall et al., 2013).”
BackgroundIslamic finance in Kazakhstan: the view of experts
Nagimova, A. (2023) · Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1108/jiabr-09-2021-0265 · Cited by 16
Raddad, S. H. (2022) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127734 · Cited by 17
Mckinley, L., Goedken, C., Balkenende, E., Clore, G., Hockett, S. S., Bartel, R., Bradley, S., Judd, J., Lyons, G., Rock, C., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2022.05.014 · Cited by 16
Kwon, J., & Kim, J. Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581918 · Cited by 16
“Marshall (2013) analyzed 83 studies from information systems journals and recommended 15–30 for single case projects; Vasileiou (2018) analyzed 214 health research articles and found the medians of the sample sizes used in the studies published in three leading journals ranged from 15 to 31.”
BackgroundDiscretionary effort of higher education sector employees: motivators and inhibitors
Sharafizad, J., & Redmond, J. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1628200 · Cited by 18
“Qualitative studies generally need to include 20–30 interviews to gather sufficient evidence from those that have experienced the phenomenon, to allow data saturation to be reached, and to improve the reliability of data analysis (Eisenhardt 1989; Marshall et al. 2013; Sharafizad 2018).”
BackgroundElmi, M. A., & Ngwenyama, O. (2020) · Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/isd2.12138 · Cited by 16
Consumer acceptance of social recommender systems in India
Virdi, P., Kalro, A. D., & Sharma, D. (2020) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-05-2018-0177 · Cited by 24
Vroom’s expectancy theory to motivate academic library users in India using grounded theory approach
Chopra, K. (2018) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-09-2018-0079 · Cited by 35
A survey on bankers’ perception of corporate social responsibility in India
Pratihari, S. K., & Uzma, S. (2019) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-11-2016-0198 · Cited by 16
Rucker, A. J., Murray, A., Gaul, Z., Sutton, M., & Wilson, P. (2018) · Culture, Health and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2017.1375156 · Cited by 16
“We anticipated that data saturation would be reached by interviewing 30 participants (Guest, Bunce, and Johnson 2006; Marshall et al. 2013).”
BackgroundCamlin, T. J., Eulert, D., Horvath, A. T., Bucky, S. F., Barsuglia, J. P., & Polanco, M. (2018) · Journal of Psychedelic Studies · doi:10.1556/2054.2018.004 · Cited by 21
“The smaller sample size was intentionally selected to be consistent with similar studies with similar designs and similar research problems (Carroll, 2008; Marshall et al., 2013).”
ResultWaiganjo, A. (2018) · Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale · doi:10.1007/s12134-018-0537-5 · Cited by 16
Creating a safety net for patients in crisis: paramedic perspectives towards a GP referral scheme
Blodgett, J., Robertson, D., Ratcliffe, D., & Rockwood, K. (2017) · doi:10.12968/jpar.2017.9.1.11 · Cited by 16
Nixon, M., & Kousgaard, M. B. (2016) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1495-2 · Cited by 18
“Having surveyed recent qualitative studies of GPs experiences with medication issues, where sample sizes varied from 7 to 29 with most of these being focus group studies [3, 27–29] we considered 24 informants to be an appropriate sample size for an explorative study like this [30].”
BackgroundKetkaew, C., Oktaviani, R., Padthar, S., Leeanansaksiri, R., Meethonglang, T., & Hanna, A. (2024) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100433 · Cited by 16
Evarist, C., Luvara, V., & Chileshe, N. (2023) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2022.2031556 · Cited by 16
“Similarly, studies using a qualitative approach typically have a smaller sample size than studies with a quantitative design (Marshall et al. 2013).”
Small Business Strategies for Sustainability Beyond 10 Years
Warren, G., & Szostek, L. (2017) · International Journal of Applied Management and Technology · doi:10.5590/ijamt.2017.16.1.07 · Cited by 10
Hung, T. H., TRINH, V. T., & Le, T. M. (2025) · Innovative Marketing · doi:10.21511/im.21(2).2025.03 · Cited by 11
“In accordance with Marshall et al. (2015), the sample size of 20 participants was determined sufficient to reach data saturation.”
Halal certification of marketing mix focusing on cosmetics
Islam, M. M., Talib, M. S. A., & Muhamad, N. (2024) · Journal of Islamic Marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-02-2024-0094 · Cited by 15
Developing personas to inform the design of digital interventions for perinatal mental health
Zimmermann, M., Yonkers, K. A., Tabb, K. M., Schaefer, A. J., Peacock‐Chambers, E., Clare, C. A., Boudreaux, E. D., Lemon, S. C., Byatt, N., & Tulu, B. (2024) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae112 · Cited by 16
Mensah, R. O. (2024) · Cogent Arts & Humanities · doi:10.1080/23311983.2024.2335777 · Cited by 15
“…are no longer producing fresh themes or insights (Braun & Clarke 2021). to guarantee that the data gathered is sufficiently comprehensive and diverse, it is generally recommended to strive for a sample size of at least 10–20 participants for phenomenological investigations (Marshall et al., 2013).”
Addy, M. N., Addo, E. T., Abdulai, S. F., Kwofie, T. E., Aigbavboa, C. O., & Adade-Boateng, A. O. (2024) · Journal of Engineering Design and Technology · doi:10.1108/jedt-08-2023-0373 · Cited by 20
Areesophonpichet, S., Bhula-or, R., Malaiwong, W., Phadung, S., & Thanitbenjasith, P. (2024) · International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.23.2.7 · Cited by 15
“In total, 23 organizations were relevant to the sample size required for qualitative research employing the phenomenological inquiry strategy (Marshall et al., 2013).”
MethodPeretz, H. V., & Kidron, A. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2254789 · Cited by 16
“The study’s twenty-three participants permit sufficient attention to be devoted to data collection and analysis and to result in meaningful findings (see Marshall et al. 2013).”
dos Reis, J. C. G., Melão, N. F., Costa, J., & Pernica, B. (2022) · Defence Studies · doi:10.1080/14702436.2022.2033117 · Cited by 25
Ketkaew, C., van Wouwe, M., Jorrisen, A., Cassimon, D., Vichitthamaros, P., & Wongsaichia, S. (2022) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks10010008 · Cited by 15
“Most qualitative papers suggested a sample of 25 to 30 should be adequate (Marshall et al. 2013; Dworkin 2012; Boddy 2016).”
BackgroundAlAmer, N. A., AlOmar, R. S., AlKaltham, S., Alyami, R., AlRashidi, F. N., AlJrri, M. M., & Wahab, M. M. A. (2020) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s283568 · Cited by 15
“For the in-depth interview: due to the lack of concrete guidelines for estimating the sample size in qualitative studies, a review of qualitative interviews has recommended a minimum number of interviews ranging from 6 to 50.(20) In this study, we aimed to interview the managers until theoretical saturation is reached.”
BackgroundA content analysis of case records: Two-generations of child protective services involvement
Eastman, A., Schelbe, L., & McCroskey, J. (2019) · Children and youth services review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.12.030 · Cited by 15
Mokhar, A., Kühn, S., Topp, J., Dirmaier, J., Härter, M. C., & Verthein, U. (2019) · BJGP Open · doi:10.3399/bjgpopen18x101626 · Cited by 14
“Third, the sample size of each focus group was appropriate according to the method.(38,39) There are several limitations to the study.”
MethodSubgroup Perspectives on Chronic Pain and Its Management After Spinal Cord Injury.
Widerström-Noga, E., Anderson, K. D., Perez, S., Martinez‐Arizala, A., & Cambridge, J. M. (2018) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.003 · Cited by 15
Williamson, H. J., Perkins, E. A., Levin, B. L., Baldwin, J. A., Lulinski, A., Armstrong, M. I., & Massey, O. T. (2017) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-55.2.84 · Cited by 16
Gudavalli, M., Salsbury, S., Vining, R., Long, C., Corber, L., Patwardhan, A., & Goertz, C. M. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0770-6 · Cited by 15
“With this number of interviews, we achieved consistent thematic coding of participants’ attributions for treatment allocation within and across groups (largely related to the amount of pressure or force used by clinician during treatment delivery), suggesting we reached theoretical saturation on this topic [78].”
MethodUnderstanding food waste in the hospitality industry: A social practice theory approach
Nand, A., Bhattacharya, A., Prajogo, D. I., Sohal, A., & de Vass, T. (2025) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104232 · Cited by 15
What is the lived experience of anxiety for people with Parkinson’s? A phenomenological study
Lovegrove, C. J., & Bannigan, K. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249390 · Cited by 15
Understanding management educators’ perspectives on AI adoption: A qualitative study
Shahzad, F., Avunduk, Z. B., Ullah, Z., & Arslan, A. (2025) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101274 · Cited by 20
Reimagining travel memories: the role of artificial intelligence in shaping tourist experiences
Hosseini, S., Carrasco-Santos, M. J., Sthapit, E., & Melé, P. M. (2025) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2025.2576659 · Cited by 15
Islam, M. S., Mamun, M. J. A., & Hoque, I. (2025) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-025-00528-2 · Cited by 15
“Moreover, it is worth noting that the sample size is largely dependent on the number of available research papers in a given context and it can be adjusted by defining the study’s scope (Marshall et al. 2013).”
Firmansah, Y., Muqorobin, A., & Pramadhan, G. (2025) · Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1108/jiabr-09-2024-0329 · Cited by 14
Addressing the Diversity Paradox: A Resource‐Based View of DEI Best Practices
Wickham, M., Fiedler, T. A., & Donnelly, T. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3467 · Cited by 14
Plemons, A., & Spiros, M. C. (2025) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.70044 · Cited by 14
Stankevičiūtė, Ž., & Jarmalavičiūtė, I. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0314532 · Cited by 23
“In a research that employs semi-structured interviews, the sample size is often determined by the number of participants interviewed until “data saturation”, which refers to the point at which the data collection process no longer offers any new or relevant data, is achieved [73–75].”
Sandhu, K., Sarkar, P. K., & Subburaj, K. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101728 · Cited by 18
Ding, J. Y., Cleary, S. L., & Morgan, P. E. (2024) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15920 · Cited by 14
Dodanwala, T. C., & Santoso, D. S. (2024) · International Journal of Construction Education and Research · doi:10.1080/15578771.2024.2332237 · Cited by 14
“Marshall et al. (2013) analyzed the sample selection of 83 qualitative publications and concluded that the sample size varies based on cultural factors, and multiple case studies generally had a minimum of 2 cases, with a median of 5.”
Sustainable development practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: multiple case studies
Nabais, E., & Franco, M. (2024) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-08-2023-3900 · Cited by 14
Do teaching staff trust stakeholders and tools in learning analytics? A mixed methods study
Alzahrani, A. S., Tsai, Y., Aljohani, N. R., Whitelock-Wainwright, E., & Gašević, D. (2023) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10229-w · Cited by 28
Carrera-Arce, M., Baumler, R., & Hollander, J. (2023) · INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing · doi:10.1177/00469580231212218 · Cited by 17
Inter- and intra-annual changes in food consumption among rural households in East China
Li, Y., Filimonau, V., Wang, L., & Cheng, S. (2022) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.07.022 · Cited by 12
Bell, S. A., Krienke, L. K., Brown, A., Inloes, J. B., Rettell, Z., & Wyte‐Lake, T. (2022) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-022-02907-w · Cited by 20
“Analysis The processes of coding and analysis were initiated after the study team reached consensus through weekly debriefing meetings that data had reached saturation, guided by expert literature on saturation [22, 23].”
Methodİşyeri Mutluluğunun Öncülleri ve Sonuçları Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma
Beyza, E. R. E. R. (2021) · Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.47097/piar.918559 · Cited by 20
Onasanya, A. A., Keshinro, M., Oladepo, O., van Engelen, J. M. L., & Diehl, J. C. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.564381 · Cited by 16
“(43); (2) when theoretical saturation is reached by no new mention of stakeholders from the snowballing technique.”
BackgroundHow does the territory impact on entrepreneurial family embeddedness?
Martínez-Sanchis, P., Aragón-Amonarriz, C., & Iturrioz-Landart, C. (2020) · doi:10.1108/jec-09-2019-0087 · Cited by 14
Tomé-Fernández, M., Curiel-Marín, E., & Caraballo, E. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9050876 · Cited by 14
Emotional intelligence and perceived negative emotions in intercultural service encounters
Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., Leonidou, E., Vrontis, D., & Christofi, M. (2020) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-04-2019-0059 · Cited by 24
Toward a maturity model for the application of social media in healthcare
Pour, M. J., & Jafari, S. M. (2019) · Online information review (Print) · doi:10.1108/oir-02-2018-0038 · Cited by 14
Health Beliefs and Practices of African Immigrants in Canada
Brathwaite, A. C., & Lemonde, M. (2016) · Clinical Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/1054773815587486 · Cited by 13
Interview-Based Research in Accounting 2000-2014: A ReviewPreprint
Dai, N., Free, C., & Gendron, Y. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2711022 · Cited by 14
Fagbemi, T., Dosumu, O., Adigun, R., Nakpodia, F., & Sakariyahu, R. (2025) · Financial Accountability & Management · doi:10.1111/faam.12408 · Cited by 13
Perceived greenwashing and its impact on consumer behavior in the cosmetic industry
Suphasomboon, T., & Vassanadumrongdee, S. (2025) · Cleaner and Responsible Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100377 · Cited by 19
Nguyen, T. V., & Sit, H. H. W. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15010019 · Cited by 14
Developing a Comprehensive Smart City Rating System: Case of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Deeb, Y. I., Alqahtani, F. K., & Mahmoud, A. B. B. (2024) · Journal of urban planning and development · doi:10.1061/jupddm.upeng-4707 · Cited by 13
Verdiesen, I., & Dignum, V. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00211-2 · Cited by 13
“Studies have found extreme variations in sample size in qualitative research studies across all research designs [14].”
BackgroundJayasinghe, R. S., Rameezdeen, R., & Chileshe, N. (2022) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-10-2021-0853 · Cited by 16
Impact of Non-DRR NGOs’ interventions for community-based DRR mainstreaming in Bangladesh
Seddiky, M., Giggins, H., & Gajendran, T. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103088 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R.
- Affiliations
- Georgia College & State University (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-22
- ISSN
- 0887-4417 (ISSN-L)
- 2380-2057
- OpenAlex
- W124963830
- Cited by
- 1,636
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 125 · 2025: 203 · 2024: 204 · 2023: 168 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 268.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Computer Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Keywords
- sample size justification, qualitative interviews, qualitative research rigor, information systems research, number of authors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review