Student teachers’ situational engagement during teaching practice in Finland and South Africa
Open accessAbstract
This article reports the outcomes of research on student teachers' situational engagement during their third-year teaching practice in university-affiliated teaching schools (teacher training schools) at the universities of Helsinki, Finland and Johannesburg, South Africa. We have explored situations that possibly engage the student teachers during the teaching practice related to learning, social interaction, working with different domains of teacher knowledge and sourcing from different origins. We have approached the experience of engagement the in the context of flow theory. For the experience sampling measurement, we operationalised engagement as a state of involvement in a learning task identified by higher-than-average individual states of interest, skill and challenge in a situation. In Johannesburg, 42% of all situations were engaging for students compared to 29% in Helsinki. The results emphasise the significance of personal interaction with mentors and university lecturers in supporting engagement. The student teachers found teaching, planning and reflecting on their lessons more engaging than other activities or informal discussions. Students at both universities experienced similar amounts of SMK, PCK and GPK and found working with these categories of knowledge engaging. It is important to include teaching practice in teacher education programmes and organise it in university-affiliated teacher training schools, where mentors can scaffold the students' reflection process, support the students in combining theoretical and practical perspectives of the teaching profession and guide students to seek information from various knowledge sources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pre-service teachers frequently experience difficulty in curriculum implementation and differentiation during school-based teaching practice placements.
“A last, but significant challenge includes curriculum implementation, pacing and specifically differentiation to meet individual learner needs.”
From Using LEGO® Six Bricks® as an educational resource to address challenges pre-service teachers face during school-based teaching practice (2025) · cites this paper as Loukomies et al., 2021
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20303 · Cited by 1,956 · see citing works
Hektner, J., Schmidt, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007) · doi:10.4135/9781412984201 · Cited by 1,174 · see citing works
Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197 · Cited by 1,108 · see citing works
Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Quin, D. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316669434 · Cited by 565 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In general, a better quality teacher-student relationship is associated with higher levels of engagement (Quin, 2017).”
BackgroundKim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum
Allen, J. M., & Wright, S. E. (2014) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2013.848568 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Reciprocal relations between students’ academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time
Putwain, D. W., Becker, S., Symes, W., & Pekrun, R. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.004 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maraisa, E., & Botha, C. (2025) · African Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.21083/ajote.v14i2.8472
- Authors
- Loukomies, A., Petersen, N., Ramsaroop, S., Henning, E., & Lavonen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Loukomies, Anni
- Venue
- The Teacher Educator
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-10-22
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-279
- ISSN
- 0887-8730 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-8101
- OpenAlex
- W3209453513
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Teacher Educator (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- the Academy of Finland (23 and, 27)
- and European Commission (70)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
- Keywords
- pre-service teachers, teaching practice, flow theory, teacher professional development, mentoring, content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, general pedagogical knowledge, reflective practice, knowledge sources, Finland, South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review