Cited by 59Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEating Disorders and Behaviors

Risk factors for weight gain during methadone maintenance treatment

Peles, Einat, Schreiber, Shaul, Sason, Anat, Adelson, Miriam·2016·Substance Abuse

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weight gain was reported during methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). However, its relation to eating habits and specific risk factors, including methadone dose or serum level, was limited. The aims of this study were to characterize risk factors for weight gain and to study current eating habits, food preferences, and nutrition knowledge. METHODS: Patients with available measures of weight and height (body mass index [BMI]) at admission to MMT and at follow-up, when methadone serum levels were determined (after 1 year or when stabilized) (N = 114), were studied (using the Addiction Severity Index [ASI], drugs in urine, methadone doses, and serum levels). In addition, 109 current patients with available earlier (5.8 ± 2.6 years earlier) BMI completed eating behavior rating and nutrition knowledge questionnaires, and their current and earlier BMI were compared. RESULTS: The BMI of 114 newly admitted patients increased from 22.5 ± 3.8 to 24.4 ± 4.3 (P < .0005). Once stabilized on methadone, BMI increased further (24.3 ± 4.5 to 25.6 ± 5.0; P < .0005; n = 74), with no change in methadone doses (125.6 ± 32.5 to 128.0 ± 34.1; F = 1.4, P = .2) or serum levels (495.6 ± 263.7 to 539.8 ± 306.2; F = 1.3, P = .2). Repeated-measures analyses revealed that BMI elevation was higher among 45 hepatitis C virus seronegative and 46 non-benzodiazepine-abusing on-admission patients. Those who scored lower on knowledge about healthy diet and showed a higher sweet-foods preference had a higher BMI. CONCLUSION: BMI increased over time, but independent of methadone dosage and blood levels. As expected, worse diet habits and a desire for sweet foods are related to higher BMI. Paradoxically, healthier status (i.e., hepatitis C seronegative, no benzodiazepine abuse) at admission is predictive of greater weight gain during MMT. Education about nutrition habits is recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08897077.2016.1179705

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peles, E., Schreiber, S., Sason, A., & Adelson, M.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Peles, Einat
Venue
Substance Abuse
Published
2016-10
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
613-618
ISSN
  • 0889-7077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0164
OpenAlex
W2339709656
Cited by
59
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Substance Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Adelson Family Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
methadone maintenance treatment, weight gain, body mass index, risk factors, dietary habits, nutrition knowledge, sweet food preference, benzodiazepine misuse, methadone dose, opioid use disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Health Status, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Methadone, Opioid-Related Disorders, Narcotics, Psychotropic Drugs, Risk Factors, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Young Adult, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review