Cited by 53Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

A Parvancorina -like arthropod from the Cambrian of South China

Lin, Jih-Pai, Gon, Samuel M., Gehling, James G., Babcock, Loren E., Zhao, Yuan-Long, Zhang, Xing-Liang, Hu, Shi-Xue, Yuan, Jin-Liang +2 more·2006·Historical Biology

Abstract

Constraining the origin of animal groups is allowed, to some extent, by discoveries of Cambrian Lagerstätten that preserve both mineralizing and nonmineralizing organisms. A new species is reported here of the Cambrian arthropod Skania, which bears an exoskeleton that shares homologies with the Neoproterozoic (Ediacaran) organism Parvancorina and firmly establishes a Precambrian root for arthropods. A new monophyletic group, Parvancorinomorpha, is proposed as the first clade within the arthropod crown group demonstrably ranging across the Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic transition. The Parvancorinomorpha is interpreted to be the sister group of the Arachnomorpha. Incipient cephalization in Skania and related genera represents a step in the progression toward division of a cephalon from a large posterior trunk as shown in Cambrian arachnomorphs such as naraoiids and the addition of a pygidium and thoracic tergites as shown in the arachnomorph clade basal to trilobites. This evidence can serve as a new calibration point for estimating the divergence time for the last common ancestor of arthropods and priapulids based on molecular clock methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08912960500508689

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, J.-P., Gon, S. M., Gehling, J. G., Babcock, L. E., Zhao, Y.-L., Zhang, X.-L., Hu, S.-X., Yuan, J.-L., Yu, M.-Y., & Peng, J.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • Guizhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lin, Jih-Pai
Venue
Historical Biology
Published
2006-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
33-45
ISSN
  • 0891-2963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-2381
OpenAlex
W2152628496
Cited by
53
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Historical Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Cambrian arthropods, Ediacaran, cephalization, pygidium, divergence time calibration, priapulids, South China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review