The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964)
Open accessAbstract
(2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964) Critical Review: Vol. 18, Democratic Competence, pp. 1-74.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GRAHAM, M. H., & SVOLIK, M. W. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000052 · Cited by 1,044
The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y · Cited by 904
Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion
Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/590649 · Cited by 874
Lifting the Veil of Morality: Choice Blindness and Attitude Reversals on a Self-Transforming Survey
Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Strandberg, T. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045457 · Cited by 192
Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions
Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9335-y · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Converse, P. E.
- Venue
- Critical Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 1-74
- ISSN
- 0891-3811 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2023218010
- Cited by
- 1,143
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08913810608443650
- The paper
- Converse, P. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
