Cited by 906Misinformation and Its ImpactsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMedia Influence and Politics

The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence

Open access
Wood, Thomas, Porter, Ethan·2019·Political Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is mixed research regarding whether corrections may actually increase belief in the original misinformation or in other misleading claims that fail to get corrected.

    “Moreover, there is mixed research regarding whether corrections may actually increase belief in the original misinformation 121,124-126 or in other misleading claims that fail to get corrected 127 .”
  • The negative influence/backfire effect is elusive, with limited relevance for politics outside the laboratory; while we may be less influenced by political opponents, we are unlikely to be negatively influenced by them.

    “This has brought researchers to conclude that negative influence effect is elusive, with limited relevance for politics outside the laboratory (88, 90, 93–95): while we may be less influenced by our political opponents, we are unlikely to be negatively influenced by them.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, T., & Porter, E.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Wood, Thomas
Venue
Political Behavior
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
135-163
ISSN
  • 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6687
OpenAlex
W3126124149
Cited by
904
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 15
FWCI
138.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Cato Institute (ID0EMTAG524)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
backfire effect, factual information, partisan attitudes, fact-checking, political polarization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review