The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learner‐interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners
Abstract
Most treatments of the concept of interaction in distance education have been based on Moore's (1989) discussion of three types of interaction: learner‐content, learner‐instructor, and learner‐learner. However, these previous discussions have failed to consider the interaction that occurs between the learner and the technologies used to deliver instruction. This article presents the concept of learner‐interface interaction and recommends instructional design strategies that will facilitate students' acquisition of the skills needed to participate effectively in the electronic classroom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Psychology of Everyday Things
Massaro, D. W., & Norman, D. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423268 · Cited by 3,466
Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715
Editorial: Three types of interaction
Moore, M. G. (1989) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923648909526659 · Cited by 2,471
The psychology of everyday things
Weld, D. S. (1989) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(89)90083-0 · Cited by 2,105
Moore, M. G. (1993) · Cited by 1,762
Dedre Gentner, C. (1983) · Cited by 1,329
Foundations of Distance Education
Constable, H., & Keegan, D. (1990) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121033 · Cited by 837
Foundations of Distance Education
Keegan, D. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315004822 · Cited by 836
The art of human-computer interface design
Spring, M. B. (1991) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/0920-5489(91)90073-9 · Cited by 709
Orivel, F. (1987) · Economics of Education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-033379-3.50014-0 · Cited by 578
Cited by
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864 · Cited by 1,637
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 · Cited by 1,221
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001 · Cited by 1,082
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703290252934603 · Cited by 566
A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338 · Cited by 540
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Distance Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 30-42
- ISSN
- 0892-3647 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-9286
- OpenAlex
- W1989052356
- Cited by
- 1,045
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 23.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learner‐interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08923649409526853
- The paper
- Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner‐interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
