The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A three-species biofilm model for the evaluation of enamel and dentin demineralization
Abstract
Although Streptococcus mutans biofilms have been useful for evaluating the cariogenic potential of dietary carbohydrates and the effects of fluoride on dental demineralization, a more appropriate biofilm should be developed to demonstrate the influence of other oral bacteria on cariogenic biofilms. This study describes the development and validation of a three-species biofilm model comprising Streptococcus mutans, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Streptococcus gordonii for the evaluation of enamel and dentin demineralization after cariogenic challenges and fluoride exposure. Single- or three-species biofilms were developed on dental substrata for 96 h, and biofilms were exposed to feast and famine episodes. The three-species biofilm model produced a large biomass, mostly comprising S. mutans (41%) and S. gordonii (44%), and produced significant demineralization in the dental substrata, although enamel demineralization was decreased by fluoride treatment. The findings indicate that the three-species biofilm model may be useful for evaluating the cariogenic potential of dietary carbohydrates other than sucrose and determining the effects of fluoride on dental substrata.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“About the use of surface hardness as indicator of dentine mineral loss, it has been widely employed [25, 33, 34, 36, 39, 56–59] because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography [25], which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine [60].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Periasamy, S., & Jakubovics, N. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2381 · Cited by 1,309
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1159/000154783 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000347050 · DOI
- 10.1111/odi.2011.17.issue-7 · DOI
- 10.1159/000324598 · DOI
- 10.1159/000096100 · DOI
- 10.1590/S1806-83242010000200002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000016629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00412.x · DOI
- Giacaman RA, 2012, Effect of fluoridated milk on enamel and root dentin demineralization evaluated by a biofilm caries model, 46, 460
- 10.1159/000322646 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(73)90109-X · DOI
- 10.1159/000077757 · DOI
- Gutiérrez de Annan S, 1997, Acta Odontol Latinoam, 10, 47
- 10.1128/AEM.01299-08 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0045795 · DOI
- 10.1111/prd.2006.42.issue-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/jac/dkg449 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JB.01649-09 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JB.00276-08 · DOI
- 10.1002/jbm.b.v101b.5 · DOI
- 10.1111/jam.2004.97.issue-6 · DOI
- Loesche WJ, 1986, Microbiol Rev, 50, 353, 10.1128/MMBR.50.4.353-380.1986 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/154405910608501002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1079/BJN20051452 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3827-3830.2004 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034512442894 · DOI
- 10.1080/000163599428562 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1590/S1806-83242010000500003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00226-8 · DOI
- 10.1159/000261013 · DOI
- Wilson K, 2001, Curr Protoc Mol Biol
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002623 · DOI
- 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4438-4441.2003 · DOI
- 10.7883/yoken.66.11 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.00309-11 · DOI
- Zylber LJ, 1982, J Clin Microbiol, 15, 253, 10.1128/JCM.15.2.253-259.1982 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Self-citationCosta, R. C., Souza, J. G. S., Bertolini, M., Retamal‐Valdes, B., Feres, M., & Barão, V. A. R. (2020) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/clr.13663 · Cited by 48
Self-citationRelevance of Biofilm Models in Periodontal Research: From Static to Dynamic Systems
Sánchez, M. C., Alonso-Español, A., Ribeiro-Vidal, H., Alonso, B., Herrera, D., & Sanz, M. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9020428 · Cited by 39
Maske, T. T., Brauner, K. V., Nakanishi, L., Arthur, R. A., van de Sande, F. H., & Cenci, M. S. (2016) · Biofouling · doi:10.1080/08927014.2015.1130824 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavalcanti, Y. W., Bertolini, M. M., da Silva, W. J., Del-Bel-Cury, A. A., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A.
- Venue
- Biofouling
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-04-14
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 579-588
- ISSN
- 0892-7014
- 1029-2454
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
