The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants
Abstract
In the present work, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models have been built for a wide variety of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants, with their Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity measured using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical and 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) radical (ABTS√+) assay methods. Non-linear models obtained using genetic partial least-squares technique were acceptable both in terms of internal and external predictivity. Validation of developed models using metrics and randomisation technique yielded results indicating the predictivity and robustness, respectively, of the developed models. The models signify that the presence of ketonic oxygen within the molecular structure favours their antioxidant activity. In addition, the number of hydroxyl groups, extent of branching, degree of methoxylation and the number of methyl and methylene substituents also dictate the antioxidant activity of these molecules. Thus, the QSAR models developed here can be utilised for the antioxidant activity prediction of a new series of molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SNEDECOR, G. W. (1939) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-193902000-00006 · Cited by 19,359
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
Free Radicals in the Physiological Control of Cell Function
Dröge, W. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2001 · Cited by 9,855
Oxyl radicals, redox-sensitive signalling cascades and antioxidants
Genestra, M. (2007) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.04.009 · Cited by 4,930
Budavari, S. (1998) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · Cited by 2,741
Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external
Gramatica, P. (2007) · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · doi:10.1002/qsar.200610151 · Cited by 2,208
Wright, J. S., Johnson, E. R., & DiLabio, G. A. (2001) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja002455u · Cited by 1,610
HANSCH, C., MALONEY, P. P., FUJITA, T., & MUIR, R. M. (1962) · Nature · doi:10.1038/194178b0 · Cited by 1,056
Rogers, D., & Hopfinger, A. J. (1994) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci00020a020 · Cited by 982
Cai, Y.-Z., Sun, M., Xing, J., Luo, Q., & Corke, H. (2006) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2005.11.004 · Cited by 727
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitra, I., Saha, A., & Roy, K.
- Venue
- Molecular Simulation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1067-1079
- ISSN
- 0892-7022 (ISSN-L)
- 1029-0435
- OpenAlex
- W2015271274
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 20.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08927022.2010.503326
- The paper
- Mitra, I., Saha, A., & Roy, K. (2010). Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants. Molecular Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2010.503326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.