Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapy Dogs Improve Student Affect but Not Memory

Trammell, Janet P.·2019·Anthrozoös

Abstract

While students are increasingly struggling with anxiety and depression, the effects of therapy dogs on student stress has only recently been explored. This study was conducted to investigate whether therapy dogs can improve student affect and to determine if these benefits extend to cognition in the form of enhanced ability to remember information. Forty-four college students were randomly assigned to interact with a therapy dog or not during both learning (session 1) and testing (session 2) in a paired-associates procedure. Arousal, stress, and mood were measured at the beginning and end of each session. As predicted, therapy dogs increased happiness and decreased stress and arousal. However, there was no difference in recognition memory for the paired associates between the therapy dog and control conditions. Mood was a significant predictor of memory, such that decreased happiness in session 2 predicted better recognition performance. These findings indicate that the benefits of therapy dogs are primarily affective and not cognitive.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08927936.2019.1645514

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.06.008 · DOI
  2. Allen K., 2002, Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 727
  3. 10.1080/00049530903312899 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/08927936.2015.1069988 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1101/lm.62403 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Clore G. L., 2001, Handbook of affect and social cognition, 121
  7. 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Crump C., 2015, North American Journal of Psychology, 17, 575
  9. Fine A. H., 2015, Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Foundations and guidelines for animal- assisted interventions
  10. 10.2752/175303712X13403555186172 · DOI
  11. 10.2752/175303710X12750451258896 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/08927936.2015.1052282 · DOI
  13. 10.2752/175303712X13316289505387 · DOI
  14. 10.2752/089279307X245509 · DOI
  15. 10.2752/175303709X457603 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00065-7 · DOI
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5139-04.2005 · DOI
  18. 10.1006/brbi.1998.0537 · DOI
  19. 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3f.1133 · DOI
  20. 10.3109/10253890903277579 · DOI
  21. 10.1006/nlme.2002.4080 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.3758/s13415-014-0256-0 · DOI
  23. Schwarz N., 1990, Handbook of motivation and cognition, 2, 527
  24. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.601 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.07.009 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/08927936.2017.1370244 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/02699931.2013.822346 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.01.017 · DOI
  29. 10.3758/BF03202444 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/cne.920180503 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Trammell, J. P.
Affiliations
Pepperdine University, Malibu, California, USA
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2019-09-03
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
691-699
ISSN
  • 0892-7936
  • 1753-0377
Cited by
19
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review