The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community Resilience: An Indicator of Social Sustainability
Abstract
Change is a constant force, in nature and in society. Research suggests that resilience pertains to the ability of a system to sustain itself through change via adaptation and occasional transformation. This article is based on the premises that communities can develop resilience by actively building and engaging the capacity to thrive in an environment characterized by change, and that community resilience is an important indicator of social sustainability. Community resilience, as defined herein, is the existence, development, and engagement of community resources by community members to thrive in an environment characterized by change, uncertainty, unpredictability, and surprise. The U.S. Roundtable on Sustainable Forests commissioned a research project to develop a theoretically and empirically based definition of community resilience as well as an associated measurement instrument. In this article, the research is presented, the emergent definition and dimensions of community resilience are posited, and the Community Resilience Self Assessment is introduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821
Cited by
Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach
Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.736605 · Cited by 1,759
Folke, C. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09088-210444 · Cited by 982
Resilience and sustainability: Similarities and differences in environmental management applications
Marchese, D., Reynolds, E., Bates, M. E., Morgan, H., Clark, S. S., & Linkov, I. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086 · Cited by 560
Resilience for Whom? Emerging Critical Geographies of Socio‐ecological Resilience
Cretney, R. (2014) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12154 · Cited by 540
Reviewing the Use of Resilience Concepts in Forest Sciences
Nikinmaa, L., Lindner, M., Cantarello, E., Jump, A. S., Seidl, R., Winkel, G., & Muys, B. (2020) · Current Forestry Reports · doi:10.1007/s40725-020-00110-x · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Magis, K.
- Venue
- Society & Natural Resources
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 401-416
- ISSN
- 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0723
- OpenAlex
- W2161352328
- Cited by
- 1,477
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 93.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Resilience: An Indicator of Social Sustainability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08941920903305674
- The paper
- Magis, K. (2010). Community Resilience: An Indicator of Social Sustainability. Society & Natural Resources. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903305674
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.