The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism
Abstract
Relatively little information yet exists regarding gender differences in environmental concern and activism. What information is available has so far provided a mixed picture, with some studies indicating men to be more concerned than women, others indicating women to be more concerned, and still others finding no significant differences. This study provides additional evidence from national survey data. From these data, women were found to express greater concern for the environment than men before and after applying multivariate controls for age, education, labor force/homemaker status, and other variables. However, the magnitude of the differences was not great. Gender differences in environmental activism provided an ironic contrast. Even though women indicated somewhat greater concern, rates of environmental activism for women were substantially lower than for men. Furthermore, these differences were greater than differences in rates of general political participation and persisted in spite of multivariate controls for socioeconomic status, homemaker status, and other variables. That the environmental activity of women appears to be constrained by factors in addition to those constraining general political activity is similar to earlier findings regarding the environmental activity of blacks. Common threads in these findings are explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Value orientations, gender and environmental concern
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916593255002 · Cited by 2,162
Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors*
Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x · Cited by 799
Correlates of Environmental Behaviors: Bringing Back Social Context
Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916501332002 · Cited by 441
The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity.
Dono, J., Webb, J., & Richardson, B. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.006 · Cited by 372
Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2326 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohai, P.
- Venue
- Society & Natural Resources
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0723
- OpenAlex
- W1980107263
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08941929209380772
- The paper
- Mohai, P. (1992). Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society & Natural Resources. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929209380772
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.