Cited by 56Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Ecology and ConservationCommunity and Sustainable Development

Community stability and the relationship between economic and social well‐being in forest‐dependent communities

Beckley, Thomas M.·1995·Society & Natural Resources

Abstract

(1995). Community stability and the relationship between economic and social well‐being in forest‐dependent communities. Society & Natural Resources: Vol. 8, Society and Non‐Timber Forest Products in Asia, pp. 261-266.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08941929509380919

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beckley, T. M.
Affiliations
Natural Resources Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Beckley, Thomas M.
Venue
Society & Natural Resources
Published
1995-05
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
261-266
ISSN
  • 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0723
OpenAlex
W2115747223
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Community and Sustainable Development
Keywords
community stability, economic well-being, social well-being, forest-dependent communities, non-timber forest products, livelihoods, community resilience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review