The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why are older adults victims of fraud? Current knowledge and prospects regarding older adults’ vulnerability to fraud
Abstract
Older adults are disproportionately targeted by various kinds of fraud, which result in irreversible economic losses and great psychological distress. Over the past years, researchers have conducted systematic research on the prevalence, under-reporting, and research methods of fraud victimization in older adults. Research paradigms regarding fraud victimization among older adults have mainly included cognitive, emotion regulation and motivation, and comprehensive paradigms. Factors shown to influence fraud victimization among older adults include cognitive decline, emotional regulation and motivational changes, their overly trusting nature, psychological vulnerability, social isolation, risk-taking, and a lack of knowledge and information regarding fraud prevention. Based on a review of the literature, future research can benefit from constructing a comprehensive fraud victimization theory, improving research methods, extending existing research, exploring physiological mechanisms of elderly fraud, and strengthening prevention and intervention efforts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to research, most scam victims do not have dementia (James et al. 2014), although cognitive decline may apply (DeLiema et al. 2020; Shao et al. 2019).”
From “If We Don’t Listen to Them, We Make Them Lose More than Money:” Exploring Reasons for Underreporting and the Needs of Older Scam Victims (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al. 2019
Citations
Cites
The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development
Carstensen, L. L. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127488 · Cited by 2,554
Financial literacy around the world: an overview
LUSARDI, A., & MITCHELL, O. S. (2011) · Journal of Pension Economics and Finance · doi:10.1017/s1474747211000448 · Cited by 2,000
Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1024569803230 · Cited by 1,978
Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005 · Cited by 1,910 · cited 2×
“Specifically, when people realize that their future time is limited, they tend to avoid negative emotional experiences and pay more attention to the positive, which has been termed the “positivity effect” in the aging process (Carstensen, 2006; Mather & Carstensen, 2005).”
BackgroundTime counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships.
Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125 · Cited by 1,324
At the Intersection of Emotion and Cognition: Aging and the Positivity Effect
Carstensen, L. L., & Mikels, J. A. (2005) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x · Cited by 1,007
Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01455 · Cited by 808
Zhang, H., & Maloney, L. T. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00001 · Cited by 679
THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
(1953) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1953.tb02967.x · Cited by 626
Financial Literacy and Planning: Implications for Retirement Well-being
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696819.003.0002 · Cited by 521
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- AARP, 1996, Telemarketing fraud and the older consumer: An AARP survey
- AARP, 2003, Off the hook: Reducing participation in telemarketing fraud
- Consumer Fraud Research, 2006, Investor fraud study final report
- Deevy M., 2013, The scope of the problem: An overview of fraud prevalence measurement
- DeLiema M., 2015, Using mixed methods to identify the characteristics of older fraud victims(Unpublished thesis)
- Duan W. H., 2016, Library, 5, 95
- Gross E. A., 1999, Elderly victims of telemarketing fraud: Demographic, social, and psychological factors in victimization and willingness to report (Unpublished thesis)
- Holtfreter K., 2006, ST. Thomas Law Review, 18, 761
- Jackson S. L., 2013, Financial abuse of elderly people vs. other forms of elder abuse: Assessing their dynamics, risk factors, and society’s response
- 10.1086/jcr.1986.13.issue-3 · DOI
- Lusardi A., 2012, Generations, 36, 25
- Mather M., 2006, When I’m, 64, 145
- MetLife, 2011, The MetLife study of elder financial abuse crimes of occasion, desperation, and predation against America’s elders
- Pak K., 2011, AARP foundation national fraud victim study
- Pu B. Y., 2016, Psychological Development and Education, 32, 114
- Stiegel L. A., 2012, Generations, 36, 73
- Titus R. M., 2001, Crimes of Privilege: Readings in White-Collar Crime(pp. 57–67)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Payne, B. K. (2020) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-020-09532-6 · Cited by 84
How do Older Adults feel about engaging with Cyber‐Security?
Morrison, B. A., Coventry, L., & Briggs, P. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.291 · Cited by 103
Consumer Fraud against Older Adults in Digital Society: Examining Victimization and Its Impact
Kemp, S., & Erades Pérez, N. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20075404 · Cited by 70
Ten questions concerning smart and healthy built environments for older adults
Kumar, S., Underwood, S. H., Masters, J., Manley, N. A., Konstantzos, I., Lau, J., Haller, R., & Wang, L. M. (2023) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110720 · Cited by 60
The Scams Among Us: Who Falls Prey and Why
Hanoch, Y., & Wood, S. (2021) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721421995489 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, J., Zhang, Q., Ren, Y., Li, X., & Lin, T.
- Affiliations
- Southwest University (CN)
- Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shao, Jingjin
- Venue
- Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-05-27
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-243
- ISSN
- 0894-6566 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4129
- OpenAlex
- W2948356543
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 21.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Social Science Fund of China (16BSH101)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Social Sciences › Law › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- fraud victimization, older adults, fraud susceptibility, cognitive decline, emotion regulation, trust, social isolation, fraud prevention
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Elder Abuse, Fraud, Humans, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
