Cited by 146Open Source Software InnovationsService and Product InnovationDesign Education and Practice

New product ideas from lead users

von Hippel, Eric·1989·Research-Technology Management

Abstract

(1989). New Product Ideas from ‘Lead Users’. Research-Technology Management: Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 24-27.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08956308.1989.11670596

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lead user approach collects experiences of advanced users to uncover system problems and solutions.

    “One parsimonious model for user identification is the lead user approach, wherein the experiences of particularly advanced users are collected to uncover system problems and solutions (which lead users often identify on their own) (von Hippel, 1989).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Hippel, E.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Sloan School of Management, in Cambridge
Venue
Research-Technology Management
Published
1989-05
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
24-27
ISSN
  • 0895-6308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-0166
OpenAlex
W2528298556
Cited by
146
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research-Technology Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
lead users, new product ideas, product innovation, user participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review