The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors
Abstract
OVERVIEW:2007 is Research-Technology Management's 50th year of publication. To mark the occasion, each issue reprints one of RTM's six most frequently referenced articles. The articles were identified by N. Thongpapanl and Jonathan D. Linton in their 2004 study of technology innovation management journals, a citation-based study in which RTM ranked third out of 25 specialty journals in that field (see RTM, May–June 2004, pp. 5–6). The benchmarking study reprinted here was originally published in 1996 and has been updated with its author's reflections. Their study of 161 business units uncovered the key drivers of new product performance at the business unit level. Ten different performance measures were gauged, including percentage of sales by new products, profitability and success rate. The ten gauges were reduced to two key performance dimensions—profitability and impact—which defined the “performance map.” Nine possible drivers—including strategy, process, organizational design, and climate for innovation—were investigated, and four key drivers of performance were identified; namely, a high-quality new product process, the new product strategy for the business unit, resource availability, and R&D spending levels. Merely having a formal new product process had no impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value
Cho, H., & Pucik, V. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.461 · Cited by 1,016
Organizational Culture and Innovation: A Meta‐Analytic Review
Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. B. (2013) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12021 · Cited by 649
Thamhain, H. J. (2003) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/1467-9310.00299 · Cited by 283
Strategic orientations and new product commercialization: mediator, moderator, and interplay
Mu, J., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2011) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00650.x · Cited by 184
Building capabilities to manage strategic alliances
Sluyts, K., Matthyssens, P., Martens, R., & Streukens, S. (2011) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.022 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J.
- Venue
- Research-Technology Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 52-66
- ISSN
- 0895-6308 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-0166
- OpenAlex
- W1542001520
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 109.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08956308.2007.11657441
- The paper
- Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2007). Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors. Research-Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2007.11657441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.