The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing innovative R&D teams
Open accessAbstract
Successful R&D groups not only generate innovative ideas, but also transfers these newly created concepts through the organizational system for economic gain. While innovation is not a random process, managers often argue that R&D performance is hard to measure and even more difficult to manage. An exploratory field study into technology‐oriented R&D environments determines the principle factors that influence innovation‐based performance of R&D teams. The results identify specific barriers and drivers to innovative team performance and provide insight into the type of an organizational environment and managerial leadership that is conducive to innovative R&D team performance. The data further suggest that many of the performance variables have their locus outside the R&D organization. Yet, managerial leadership style, both at the R&D team level and at senior management, has significant impact on creativity that ultimately affects R&D performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction
Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6 · Cited by 2,791
Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles
Alum, R. A., & Drucker, P. F. (1986) · Public Productivity Review · doi:10.2307/3380320 · Cited by 1,634
PRODUCT INNOVATION STRATEGY AND THE PERFORMANCE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY VENTURES IN CHINA.
Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069392 · Cited by 1,504
Leaders: The strategies for taking charge
Linstone, H. A. (1986) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/0040-1625(86)90067-3 · Cited by 1,438
Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution
Peters, T., & Rodabaugh, K. (1988) · The Journal of Continuing Higher Education · doi:10.1080/07377366.1988.10401142 · Cited by 976
Managing Innovation: Controlled ChaosPreprint
Quinn, J. B. (1985) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 918
Tushman, M. L. (1997) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/eb054591 · Cited by 797
Cited by
Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance
Monica Hu, M.-L., Horng, J.-S., & Christine Sun, Y.-H. (2009) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.009 · Cited by 720
The uncertainty of innovation: a systematic review of the literature
Jalonen, H. (2011) · Journal of Management Research · doi:10.5296/jmr.v4i1.1039 · Cited by 255
Chang, S.-H., Yu, L.-C., Kuo, Y.-K., Mai, Y.-T., & Chen, J.-D. (2015) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/15.14.379 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Thamhain, H. J.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05-13
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-311
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W3122513814
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing innovative R&D teams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9310.00299
- The paper
- Thamhain, H. J. (2003). Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
