The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting the Origins of the Typical-Maximum Performance Distinction
Abstract
I cannot begin to describe my delight at having the opportunity to write this introduction to the special issue on typical versus maximum performance. It's humbling to realize that a paper you've written emerges as the seminal paper that starts a new line of research. But that appears to be the case: The notion of differentiating between typical and maximum performance on the criterion side of the equation is generally credited to Sackett, Zedeck, and CitationFogli (1988).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Performance is conceptualized as a parameter of ability and motivation (Klehe and Anderson, 2007; Sackett, 2007).”
From The Moderating Influence of In-Group Collectivism on Social Loafing: An Experimental Study on a Manufacturing Factory (2026) · cites this paper as Sackett, 2007
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J., Gurdon, M., Jick, T., Petit, A., Stern, R., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,945
Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance.
Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.73.3.482 · Cited by 305
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.482 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.482 · Paper page
Cited by
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x15584327 · Cited by 993
Klehe, U., & Anderson, N. (2007) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00385.x · Cited by 39
Koçal, S., & Özcan, K. (2026) · Verimlilik Dergisi · doi:10.51551/verimlilik.1729580
Metadata
- Authors
- Sackett, P. R.
- Venue
- Human Performance
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-05-23
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 179-185
- ISSN
- 0895-9285
- 1532-7043
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
