Cited by 993Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentSchool Choice and Performance

Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes

Open access
Duckworth, Angela L., Yeager, David Scott·2015·Educational Researcher

Abstract

There has been perennial interest in personal qualities other than cognitive ability that determine success, including self-control, grit, growth mind-set, and many others. Attempts to measure such qualities for the purposes of educational policy and practice, however, are more recent. In this article, we identify serious challenges to doing so. We first address confusion over terminology, including the descriptor noncognitive. We conclude that debate over the optimal name for this broad category of personal qualities obscures substantial agreement about the specific attributes worth measuring. Next, we discuss advantages and limitations of different measures. In particular, we compare self-report questionnaires, teacher-report questionnaires, and performance tasks, using self-control as an illustrative case study to make the general point that each approach is imperfect in its own way. Finally, we discuss how each measure’s imperfections can affect its suitability for program evaluation, accountability, individual diagnosis, and practice improvement. For example, we do not believe any available measure is suitable for between-school accountability judgments. In addition to urging caution among policymakers and practitioners, we highlight medium-term innovations that may make measures of these personal qualities more suitable for educational purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x15584327

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-reports of one's general intellectual humility provide numerous opportunities for error.

    “Thus, self- reports of one's general intellectual humility provides numerous opportunities for error 45,46 .”

    From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Self-Report and Teacher-Report Questionnaires section describes several opportunities for error in reporting personal qualities, including errors in recall, reference bias, and edited responses. It does not address intellectual humility specifically, so the application to that quality goes beyond what the paper states. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using school fixed effects minimizes the possibility of reference bias in self-reported measures.

    “Another important benefit of using school fixed effects is that this approach minimizes the possibility of reference bias in our self-reported measures (West et al., 2016; Duckworth & Yeager, 2015).”

    From Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors (2017) · cites this paper as Duckworth & Yeager, 2015

    The Program Evaluation section says that within-school comparisons may hold the frame of reference constant for teacher reports, while between-school comparisons of self- and teacher-reports may be biased. It does not discuss school fixed effects or establish that they minimize reference bias in self-reports; the Self-Report and Teacher-Report Questionnaires section also notes that reference bias can occur between grades within one school. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Campbell DT Assessing the impact of planned social change 1976 Paper presented at the Conference on Social Psychology Visegrad, Hungary
  2. Carlson SM Zelazo PD Faja S Zelazo PD Executive Function The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology 2013 1 New York, NY Oxford University Press 706 742 Body and Mind
  3. D'Mello S Duckworth A Dieterle E Advanced, analytic, automated measures of state engagement during learning 2014 Manuscript under review PMC5640167 29038607
  4. Galla BM Plummer BD White R Meketon D D'Mello SK Duckworth AL Development and validation of the Academic Diligence Task Contemporary Educational Psychology 2014 39 4 314 325 25258470 PMC4170650
  5. Goldman S Self-discipline predicts academic performance among low-achieving adolescents Res: A Journal of Undergraduate Research 2006 2 1 84 97
  6. Heckman JJ Kautz TD The myth of achievement tests: The GED and the role of character in american 2014 Chicago, IL The University of Chicago Press
  7. Krosnick JA Fabrigar LR The handbook of questionnaire design New York, NY Oxford University Press (Forthcoming)
  8. Kyllonen PC Bertling J Rutkowski L von Davier M Rutkowski D Innovative questionnaire assessment methods to increase cross-country comparability A handbook of international large-scale assessment data analysis: Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis 2013 London, UK Chapman Hall/CRC Press
  9. Ziegler M MacCann C Roberts R New perspectives on faking in personality assessment 2011 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
2015-05
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
237-251
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W1853636458
Cited by
993
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2
FWCI
126.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R24AG048081, K01AG033182)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
non-cognitive skills, self-control, grit, self-report questionnaire, teacher reports, performance tasks, program evaluation, school accountability, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review