The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Theory of Planned Behavior
Abstract
This study reviews previous studies on socially responsible consumers and identifies major antecedents of behavioral intentions to contribute to the theoretical understanding of their purchase behaviors. Meta-analytic procedures were used to (1) quantify the relationship between theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs, (2) examine the contribution of additional predictors to explain behavioral intention, and (3) identify moderators that influence the strength of the relationships between TPB constructs. The results reveal key factors underlying the consumer decision-making process and provide useful information for marketers in developing strategies that can increase acceptance and purchase of products/services that address consumers' ethical concerns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 · Cited by 4,140
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209170 · Cited by 3,867
A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/586910 · Cited by 3,409
A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis
Klöckner, C. A. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014 · Cited by 1,773
Chen, M.-F., & Tung, P.-J. (2014) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.09.006 · Cited by 1,566
Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-h · Cited by 1,325
Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food
Tarkiainen, A., & Sundqvist, S. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510629760 · Cited by 1,054
Cited by
How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919825649 · Cited by 2,386
Saleki, R., Quoquab, F., & Mohammad, J. (2019) · Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jadee-02-2019-0018 · Cited by 166
Moral licensing and habits: Do solar households make negligent choices?
McCarthy, B. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.114213 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, T.-I., & Stoel, L.
- Venue
- Journal of International Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-12-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-103
- ISSN
- 0896-1530 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-7068
- OpenAlex
- W2559723709
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Theory of Planned Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08961530.2016.1251870
- The paper
- Han, T.-I., & Stoel, L. (2017). Explaining Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1251870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
