Cited by 38Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDiabetes Management and EducationCancer survivorship and care

The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Diabetes-Related Distress, Quality of Life, and Metabolic Control Among Persons with Diabetes: A Meta-Analytic Review

Bogusch, Leah M., O'Brien, William H.·2019·Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have improved psychological outcomes for multiple chronic health conditions, including diabetes. A meta-analytic review of the literature was conducted on all located studies (n = 14) investigating MBIs that targeted diabetes-related distress (DRD) and diabetes-related outcomes among people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. PsychInfo, PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science were searched for MBIs that were designed to improve DRD and other secondary outcomes, including quality of life and measures of metabolic control. A meta-analysis of these outcomes uncovered small-to-moderate effect sizes for intervention studies measuring pretreatment to posttreatment changes in DRD and metabolic control among treatment group participants. However, the pretreatment to follow-up comparisons for DRD and metabolic control were small and unreliable. For control groups, all pre-treatment to post-treatment and pre-treatment to follow-up comparisons were unreliable for all outcomes. A moderate effect size for treatment-control comparisons was found for intervention studies measuring quality of life outcomes at posttreatment, but not at follow-up comparisons. All other effect sizes for treatment-control comparisons were unreliable. Limitations and implications for MBIs among individuals with diabetes are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08964289.2018.1432549

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bogusch, L. M., & O'Brien, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • Psychology Department, Bowling Green State University
Corresponding author
Bogusch, Leah M.
Venue
Behavioral Medicine
Published
2018-04-04
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
19-29
ISSN
  • 0896-4289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4026
OpenAlex
W2796297490
Cited by
38
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, diabetes distress, quality of life, metabolic control, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review