Cited by 88Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

What Happens When the Party is Over?: Sustaining Physical Activity Behaviors after Intervention Cessation

Open access
McEwan, Desmond, Rhodes, Ryan E., Beauchamp, Mark R.·2022·Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Although extensive research suggests that behavior change interventions can improve physical activity (PA) over the course of an intervention, the maintenance of these improvements beyond intervention termination is less clear. The purpose of this study was to determine, through meta-analysis, whether behavior change interventions produce sustained improvements in PA after interventions conclude. Studies were retrieved from a recent (2019) meta-analysis of 224 interventions. Studies that measured PA at baseline, post-intervention, and a follow-up timepoint were included in this updated review. We examined the effects of these interventions in terms of changes in PA from baseline to post-intervention, baseline to follow-up, and post-intervention to follow-up (relative to control groups). We also examined whether the inclusion of theory and behavior change techniques (BCTs) within interventions as well as the length of time between PA assessments moderated these effects. Thirty-nine interventions (17% of interventions from the previous review) from 31 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Significant improvements in PA were found from baseline to follow-up (d = 0.32). In general, these effects resulted from significant increases in PA from baseline to post-intervention (d = 0.46), followed by significant decreases from post-intervention to follow-up (d = −0.18). Effect sizes did not vary between theory-based and no-stated-theory interventions. The positive effects from baseline to post-intervention and negative effects from post-intervention to follow-up were more pronounced as the length of time between assessments increased. In conclusion, behavior change interventions improve PA over the course of the intervention; however, these improvements are generally not sustained after the intervention concludes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08964289.2020.1750335

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McEwan, D., Rhodes, R. E., & Beauchamp, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
McEwan, Desmond
Venue
Behavioral Medicine
Published
2020-04-10
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0896-4289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4026
OpenAlex
W3015877482
Cited by
88
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
physical activity, behaviour change interventions, intervention maintenance, behaviour change techniques, theory-based intervention, follow-up evaluation, exercise behavior change
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review