Cited by 475Physical Activity and HealthMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Website-Delivered Physical Activity Interventions

Vandelanotte, Corneel, Spathonis, Kym M., Eakin, Elizabeth G., Owen, Neville·2007·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Evidence-based physical activity interventions that can be delivered to large numbers of adults at an acceptable cost are a public health priority; website-delivered programs have this potential. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the research findings and outcomes of website-delivered physical activity interventions and to identify relationships of intervention attributes with behavioral outcomes.Methods A structured search of PubMed, Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science was conducted for intervention studies published up to July 2006. Studies included in the review were those that (1) used websites or e-mail, (2) had physical activity behavior as an outcome measure, (3) had randomized controlled or quasi-experimental designs, (4) targeted adults, and (5) were published in English.Results Of the fifteen studies reviewed, improvement in physical activity was reported in eight. Better outcomes were identified when interventions had more than five contacts with participants and when the time to follow-up was short (</=3 months; 60% positive outcomes), compared to medium-term (3-6 months, 50%) and long-term (>6 months, 40%) follow-up. There were no clear associations of outcomes with other intervention attributes.Conclusions A little over half of the controlled trials of website-delivered physical activity interventions have reported positive behavioral outcomes. However, intervention effects were short lived, and there was limited evidence of maintenance of physical activity changes. Research is needed to identify elements that can improve behavioral outcomes, the maintenance of change and the engagement and retention of participants; larger and more representative study samples are also needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.041

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandelanotte, C., Spathonis, K. M., Eakin, E. G., & Owen, N.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Vandelanotte, Corneel
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
54-64
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W75183690
Cited by
475
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 43
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
physical activity interventions, e-health, internet-based health promotion, physical activity behavior, follow-up duration, maintenance of behavior change, adults
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Health Behavior, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review