CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaCrime Patterns and Interventions

Teen Dating Relationships and Outcomes of Well-Being: Examining Gender Differences in Nonviolent and Violent Dating Relationships

Button, Deeanna M., Miller, Susan L.·2013·Women & Criminal Justice
DOI 10.1080/08974454.2013.806839
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Teen dating violence is a prevalent problem that increases the risk of multiple negative consequences, particularly among girls. However, evidence also indicates that teen relationships in general tend to be unstable and characterized by conflict. This study uses data from the 2008 self-administered Delaware School Survey to examine gender differences in the frequency of well-being outcomes for adolescents in nonviolent, verbally aggressive, and physically aggressive relationships. Results indicate that negative well-being outcomes are prevalent in both nonviolent and violent dating relationships, particularly for girls. Adolescents in violent relationships, notably verbally violent relationships, are more likely to experience negative outcomes than adolescents in nonviolent relationships. Furthermore, findings suggest that although gender differences exist in the impact of physical violence on well-being outcomes, the impact of verbal violence on well-being does not vary by gender. Policy implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08974454.2013.806839

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Button, D. M., & Miller, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Stockton University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Button, Deeanna M.
ORCID
Venue
Women & Criminal Justice
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-07-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
247-265
ISSN
  • 0897-4454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0323
DOI
10.1080/08974454.2013.806839
OpenAlex
W2027846741
Cited by
11
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Women & Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
adolescent dating violence, adolescent relationships, gender differences, well-being outcomes, verbal aggression, physical violence, adolescent girls, relationship conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review