The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Animal Models of Complement-Mediated Hypersensitivity Reactions to Liposomes and Other Lipid-Based Nanoparticles
Abstract
Intravenous injection of some liposomal drugs, diagnostic agents, micelles and other lipid-based nanoparticles can cause acute hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in a high percentage (up to 45%) of patients, with hemodynamic, respiratory and cutaneous manifestations. The phenomenon can be explained with activation of the complement (C) system on the surface of lipid particles, leading to anaphylatoxin (C5a and C3a) liberation and subsequent release reactions of mast cells, basophils and possibly other inflammatory cells in blood. These reactions can be reproduced and studied in pigs, dogs and rats, animal models which differ from each other in sensitivity and spectrum of symptoms. In the most sensitive pig model, a few miligrams of liposome (phospholipid) can cause anaphylactoid shock, characterized by pulmonary hypertension, systemic hypotension, decreased cardiac output and major cardiac arrhythmias. Pigs also display cutaneous symptoms, such as flushing and rash. The sensitivity of dogs to hemodynamic changes is close to that of pigs, but unlike pigs, dogs also react to micellar lipids (such as Cremophor EL) and their response includes pronounced blood cell and vegetative neural changes (e.g., leukopenia followed by leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, fluid excretions). Rats are relatively insensitive inasmuch as hypotension, their most prominent response to liposomes, is induced only by one or two orders of magnitude higher phospholipid doses (based on body weight) compared to the reactogenic dose in pigs and dogs. It is suggested that the porcine and dog models are applicable for measuring and predicting the (pseudo)allergic activity of particulate "nanodrugs".
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chanan-Khan, A., Szebeni, J., Savay, S., Liebes, L., Rafique, N. M., Alving, C. R., & Muggia, F. M. (2003) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg374 · Cited by 479
Self-citation
Cited by
Doxil® — The first FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned
Barenholz, Y. (. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020 · Cited by 4,792
Self-citationNanoemulsion: Concepts, development and applications in drug delivery
Singh, Y., Meher, J. G., Raval, K., Khan, F. A., Chaurasia, M., Jain, N. K., & Chourasia, M. K. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.008 · Cited by 1,358
Minireview: Nanoparticles and the Immune System
Zolnik, B. S., González-Fernández, A., Sadrieh, N., & Dobrovolskaia, M. A. (2010) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2009-1082 · Cited by 914
Kedmi, R., Ben-Arie, N., & Peer, D. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.027 · Cited by 546
Szebeni, J. (2014) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2014.06.038 · Cited by 457
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Szebeni, J., Alving, C. R., Rosivall, L., Bünger, R., Baranyi, L., Bedöcs, P., Tóth, M., & Barenholz, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Liposome Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-117
- ISSN
- 0898-2104 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2394
- OpenAlex
- W2123366113
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal Models of Complement-Mediated Hypersensitivity Reactions to Liposomes and Other Lipid-Based Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08982100701375118
- The paper
- Szebeni, J., Alving, C. R., Rosivall, L., Bünger, R., Baranyi, L., Bedöcs, P., Tóth, M., & Barenholz, Y. (2007). Animal Models of Complement-Mediated Hypersensitivity Reactions to Liposomes and Other Lipid-Based Nanoparticles. Journal of Liposome Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982100701375118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.