Cited by 914Immunotoxicology and immune responsesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

Minireview: Nanoparticles and the Immune System

Open access
Zolnik, Banu S., González-Fernández, África, Sadrieh, Nakissa, Dobrovolskaia, Marina A.·2010·Endocrinology

Abstract

Today nanotechnology is finding growing applications in industry, biology, and medicine. The clear benefits of using nanosized products in various biological and medical applications are often challenged by concerns about the lack of adequate data regarding their toxicity. One area of interest involves the interactions between nanoparticles and the components of the immune system. Nanoparticles can be engineered to either avoid immune system recognition or specifically inhibit or enhance the immune responses. We review herein reported observations on nanoparticle-mediated immunostimulation and immunosuppression, focusing on possible theories regarding how manipulation of particle physicochemical properties can influence their interaction with immune cells to attain desirable immunomodulation and avoid undesirable immunotoxicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/en.2009-1082

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Properties such as size, surface charge, hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, and steric effects of particle coating influence compatibility of nanoparticles with immune system.

    “Additionally, the properties such as size, surface charge, hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, and the steric effects of particle coating have influence on the compatibility of nanoparticles with the immune system [147–150].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zolnik, B. S., González-Fernández, A., Sadrieh, N., & Dobrovolskaia, M. A.
Affiliations
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Área de Inmunología and Unidad Compartida Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo (Á.G.-F.), Edificio Ciencias Experimentales, University of Vigo, Campus Lagoas Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain;
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
151
Issue
2
Pages
458-465
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2000755721
Cited by
914
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 48
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN261200800001C)
  • National Cancer Institute (HHSN261200800001E))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
nanoparticles, immune system, immunomodulation, immunostimulation, immunosuppression, immunotoxicity, nanoparticle physicochemical properties, immune cell interactions, nanomedicine
MeSH terms
Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Humans, Immune System, Immunization, Immunosuppression Therapy, Infections, Liposomes, Lymphocyte Activation, Neoplasms, Polyethylene Glycols, T-Lymphocytes, Nanotechnology, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review