The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative analysis of corporate entrepreneurial orientation between selected firms in the Netherlands and the USA
Abstract
Firms in turbulent or fast-changing environments must continually innovate to remain competitive. This study examined how a firm's strategic management practices influence its entrepreneurial behaviour as compared to an international competitor. Four firms in the Netherlands were each matched with a key competitor in the USA. Several survey measures related to the strategic management process were used along with an instrument related to corporate entrepreneurship practices. Both managers and employees participated in the study. Results revealed significant differences between the Netherlands firms and the US competitors in entrepreneurial orientation. Results also supported these comparative differences along three key dimensions of strategic management as they relate to corporate entrepreneurship. The final set of data revealed a relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and three measures of firm performance. The implications focus upon the key role that culture may play in facilitating corporate entrepreneurship and adaptable organizational practices. Suggestions for further research are also made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568 · Cited by 10,159
Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250030102 · Cited by 2,758
Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Pursuit of Competitive Advantage
Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (1999) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/104225879902300304 · Cited by 1,392
Cited by
Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x · Cited by 3,550
Kraus, S., Rigtering, J. P. C., Hughes, M., & Hosman, V. (2012) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-011-0062-9 · Cited by 586
The Organizational Pervasiveness of Entrepreneurial Orientation
Wales, W., Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00451.x · Cited by 393
Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance — A Replication Study
Frank, H., Kessler, A., & Fink, M. (2010) · Schmalenbach Business Review · doi:10.1007/bf03396804 · Cited by 276
Implications of customer and entrepreneurial orientations for SME growth
Eggers, F., Kraus, S., Hughes, M., Laraway, S., & Snycerski, S. (2013) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741311309643 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Kemelgor, B. H.
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship & Regional Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-87
- ISSN
- 0898-5626 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5114
- OpenAlex
- W2060173875
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative analysis of corporate entrepreneurial orientation between selected firms in the Netherlands and the USA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08985620110087023
- The paper
- Kemelgor, B. H. (2002). A comparative analysis of corporate entrepreneurial orientation between selected firms in the Netherlands and the USA. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620110087023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
