From resource munificence to ecosystem integration: the case of government sponsorship in St. Louis
Abstract
Government sponsorship of entrepreneurship has become a popular policy tool in the last 15 years. Despite this popularity, past academic studies have largely focused on firm-level survival rates and treated the effects of government sponsorship in isolation, which fails to capture the full effect of the sponsorship. That is, the objectives of the public sector include enhancing the macro-level entrepreneurial environment of the region as well as the success of individual firms. We expand research in this area through a case study in St. Louis, Missouri. We focus on the Arch Grants, a public–private coalition that provides $50,000 to 20 winners through their annual competition. Based on interviews of 46 recipient firms and 15 support organizations, we first demonstrate how government sponsorship can create a cohort of entrepreneurs who are able to learn from each other about business strategy, local mentors and other resources. Second, we uncover the process through which sponsorship can facilitate coordination among local entrepreneurship support organizations. Thus, we conclude that the evaluation of government sponsorship should go beyond the traditional firm-level performance measurement and consider the integration and enhancement of the local entrepreneurship ecosystem.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Government sponsorship is an effective driver of ecosystem development beyond increasing individual recipient firms' performance.
“Government sponsorship is an effective driver of ecosystem development beyond increasing individual recipient firms' performance [37] Motoyama and Knowlton (2016)”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Motoyama and Knowlton (2016)
Government sponsorship is an effective driver of ecosystem development beyond increasing individual recipient firms' performance.
“Government sponsorship is an effective driver of ecosystem development beyond increasing individual recipient firms' performance [37] Motoyama and Knowlton (2016)”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Motoyama, Y., & Knowlton, K. (2016)
Cites
Network-based research in entrepreneurship
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00081-2 · Cited by 2,302 · see citing works
Malecki, E. J. (2011) · International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management · doi:10.1504/ijeim.2011.040821 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1268 · Cited by 1,163 · see citing works
Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
“While some work on ecosystems has involved structural network analysis to identify key players ( Motoyama & Knowlton, 2016 ; Pittz et al., 2019 ), there is room for further research on the cognitive and relational aspects of these networks.”
Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., Eichler, G. M., & Schwarz, E. (2024) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-023-00763-5 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Motoyama, Y., & Knowlton, K.
- Affiliations
- Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Motoyama, Yasuyuki
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship & Regional Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-05-26
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 448-470
- ISSN
- 0898-5626 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5114
- OpenAlex
- W2468860748
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Entrepreneurship and Regional Development (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial ecosystems, entrepreneurial environment, public-private partnerships, entrepreneurship support organizations, entrepreneurial learning, regional entrepreneurship policy, St. Louis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review